From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2D313933E for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 07:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53C9AE095F; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 07:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB3BE095F for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 07:02:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Aaron Bauman Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items In-Reply-To: (Aaron Bauman's message of "Mon, 5 Jul 2021 17:53:53 -0400") References: Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:02:14 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f13720fe-7b75-4c6b-b294-bea23e27f2be X-Archives-Hash: 6155b923f4ec82e799e617c8943e74a3 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2021, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 11:42:36PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The point is that banning an EAPI doesn't have any noticeable effect. >> For example, if you look at EAPI 0 (banned on 2016-01-10) and EAPI 4 >> (banned on 2018-04-08), there's neither a cusp nor any change of slope >> visible for the curves plotted here: >> https://www.akhuettel.de/~huettel/plots/eapi.php > We have had the issue in the past. Taking 1 minute to vote on a ban of > an EAPI in a council meeting is a minute task and enforces the goals > of the project. But we don't actually enforce the ban. Doing so would mean adding the EAPI to eapis-banned in layout.conf, which in turn would imply that commits of (new or existing) ebuilds with a banned EAPI would be rejected. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmDj//YPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uEfoH/ihs9U3kpSDW9ZoZjfmPeNmYbZhXdb8kKAHZ v5ot/ocsXRjTLzfeshw60aH1hNuYpxgEMHl5IL+mKVzWWdp+SCuWz5ARkYOLxlYh 22uXaq7+hkluWEOMBZKizqL3sTBWquGFOmMozhwOdv7wjFxVeo1r0FCmqAEqbWnk tPqgC2jzLvfT5GbBruhjJBs29ctPcs4SdG5fSycZEQEXQn8d1e7AtQZAvNeuUZ+w uCE2GYfv3ZbafSMt7dlbqJn23mAPwMR/1t8blWTjvxiSS3YTX4B5BQCjjFOKAIX+ KDoWO1f1uu+Q2/VfRtMV9qQ+qEqd42n8hiQ25TstXkk6u/6XKIo= =iieJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--