From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5B7158020 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BD89E08F1; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B60E08F0; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:55:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: "Robin H. Johnson" Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Richard Freeman , Alec Warner Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0076: Require real name instead of legal name In-Reply-To: (Robin H. Johnson's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:50:53 +0000") References: <20220712002836.20274-1-cyber+gentoo@sysrq.in> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:55:09 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: fd6db0b3-84cf-4f75-acd4-0124bcac4cd7 X-Archives-Hash: 9aa1d40f7e94499077adeece08ed3f1d --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Robin H Johnson wrote: >> So far we had followed the principle not to list authors in the >> acknowledgements (which is worded "the authors would like to thank"). >> If we start adding them for revision 1.2, then we'd have to add more >> names to the existing list. > How's the clarification now, making it clear those are the authors for > version 1.2? I'd still prefer a single list of acknowledgements in alphabetical order, without any of the authors included. (But I don't have a strong opinion, so if you absolutely want to have a separate paragraph for 1.2, then go ahead.) However, can we please keep the authors list (in the header) as-is? If we're now going to include people for adding a single sentence or suggestion, then we'd also have to list several (all?) of the persons who are listed in the original acknowledgements. >> Another small point: Whitespace in the new section doesn't follow the >> style in the rest of the GLEP, which uses two blank lines before and one >> blank line after section headings, as well as two spaces at the end of >> every sentence. (This is also what GLEP 2 says.) > Fixed - the blank lines were inconsistent in multiple places, but the > two spaces were correct. There shouldn't be double blank lines _after_ section headings (i.e. only a single blank line after "Specification" and "Rationale") [1]. Ulrich [1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0002.html#id15 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmNTk80PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uWpAIAMXE3903Yia41qjzLPD/inDK2MapMFcXnMHd y2x0KMlthc4sBM4TRFI23px5m7/dGEyHYuPBl4MzNCDte/d4bKIgJI9hNF/w2BXg GYQcol9EeRQyvATuf5vYtznyWgbgf9DyaxVKIWxhDQ8n2GFstohl8s4sDOGQM/hq ZkCTJSp1kLeUahjkaaVO13tYiYM32B6o2KHnbg/Ryvy2pfDZLIsmyo/kLPlPNPeV sGbgE9Yjnr6tUubSVidPzxO7J9MCG4+XtbHHXfrXjlHelKhkKPeb6ZxJd0TjnBgb Ij0BEOFdyFfosMeg1JWhk2yv4GL1Qw591mcCrWepcWN3kbPDzqA= =SzGL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--