From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O3HlY-0002sK-Qw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3342DE09AF; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1492BE09AF for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04151B4097 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.255 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.255 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.145, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0eNEgUO8EuJw for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6B11B4025 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so1126811wwb.36 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=87PJO56xRHfRtVRt5D3F4Y7pS+32lCCRuJxxaGvwmE4=; b=LnZrV3g4lBkErAQNrlsRZ/+Hosg4pC9v6MoM1TQTSii6/tFq+gTHpJKXNB50CP5fwk O9UOq0qolgzyj8+QtxbZepZiA4kH3FciP32a6qtVdrsTLPWodyZDFUS5J24o8hrUMPB0 aKXD7iEkCa4Z0iRSE+pIhaQMFIzLt1rvArRZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=Asv6bwIax8iFNOPI9NhrbOgIgVWuugSLq8Qg1+mRTwSLMOX6Hr8Zqnx5HgKs5NZ+mJ OUY9dtjj9y3EBiDUKZZwhEBjlzlmN/r0dnYDK9HdwZSqQM539T7GPTgO+19GdTLSu3zs UZwZLbVt9gPRvaHjze65eptA707ts9Fpzhwuo= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.22.78 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:49:26 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eccadcd781d261ee Received: by 10.216.86.211 with SMTP id w61mr2210646wee.50.1271548166171; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Does the council need a lead? From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: e0a120a9-924e-4af9-9499-28559698d0ae X-Archives-Hash: 62aca5bd88adde6771025726d4d810aa Does the council need a lead? All top-level projects have a lead except the council. Should we maintain this exception? How do we elect a lead? Do the developers do it or should it be left to the newly elected council members?