From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6724F13832E for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 088C921C079; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A3021C046 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVhtd-0001Oy-Um for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:22:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-08-14 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 02:22:43 +1000 Message-ID: References: <2e11e445-c25b-b7f2-def1-99aed92308b6@gentoo.org> <20160804162443.GA7048@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 05ebb9af-b360-49ee-b1d7-08bae7cc6ef3 X-Archives-Hash: 886589463dbea2bcec6522fc0727ab14 On 06/08/16 02:11, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > I would like to add an exception for metadata changes, too, but honestly > I don't trust people to use it wisely. I shouldn't have to bug the arch > teams if I add a second LICENSE and revbump... maybe if this exception > is worded strongly-enough it could do more good than harm. Why would one revbump for a change to LICENSE?