From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907A2138A6C for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8C3EE095F; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA8DE095E for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YfVaE-0004sZ-0U for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:38:34 +0200 Received: from ppp118-209-27-57.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.27.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:38:33 +0200 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-27-57.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:38:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2015-04-14: call for agenda items Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 01:38:23 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20150402141428.GA31638@oregano.home.lan> <201504032214.01310.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20150404220205.GA415@linux1> <1428237147.22472.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20150405195044.GA2917@linux1> <20150406002706.4aff7e4dda27a25a5c106b50@gentoo.org> <5521BF9C.5060809@gentoo.org> <1428353540.2041.11.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-27-57.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 3c6812b0-9e74-4093-8083-022afe91d6b1 X-Archives-Hash: 230c0b6e51f2f73ef0e1ba32ae8b1df6 On 07/04/15 08:22, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> For instance, in this topic I haven't seen any comment from >> alpha/ia64/sparc arch teams... > > I haven't commented because I don't honestly believe people care. > > I'm really disappointed that the discussion is entirely about creating > keyword-dropping policies and no one is asking whether there are > things we can do to make keyword/stable requests a more streamlined > process. But, that kind of thing seems to be par for the course on > this list. We've heard very little from arch teams at all, let alone proposals for improving the stabilisation process. That's the main reason this sort of topic keeps coming up.