From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18541389F5 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 996CCE0AC7; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CAFE0ABB for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E026340634 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.293, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzI1EATyTZU7 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CEB2340632 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpdr9-0003lz-9Z for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:57:39 +0100 Received: from ppp118-209-109-122.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.109.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:57:39 +0100 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-109-122.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:57:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Gentoo Recruiters need your help! Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:57:37 +1100 Message-ID: References: <54665115.3060706@gentoo.org> <54675866.1080506@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-109-122.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 In-Reply-To: <54675866.1080506@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c58db55b-b4c6-4800-a094-84ab258f9ed6 X-Archives-Hash: 056e5706159dfaac35eb70e7f12ebbf4 On 16/11/14 00:43, hasufell wrote: > On 11/14/2014 07:59 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The recruiters team needs your help once again. The manpower and time >> availability in the team is significantly low so we would welcome >> developers interested in assisting us and becoming full-time recruiters. >> Before you apply, please consider that this role requires a great deal >> of time and flexibility. I am sure you remember your reviews, which >> may have taken quite a few hours to complete. If you feel like you are >> up to the task, and committed to stay around for a while, please get >> in touch with us to discuss the first steps of your training process. >> In case of multiple applicants, we may prioritize experienced >> developers since they may require less time for training. >> > > We should recruit less people and instead make an effort to review other > peoples overlays and include a list of high-quality overlays on our website. > > The good part is: any dev can do this and it moves away from our broken > centralized packaging model. > In addition, this will take off workload from the recruiters team. High-quality, reviewed overlays is a good idea. We still need more recruiters though.