From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012C413877A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AC77E09CD; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BAFFE08BF for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5231C340241 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.281 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.089, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fl01V9qpOROo for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01393401E5 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XDHGi-0000wP-CU for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:09:28 +0200 Received: from ppp118-209-168-229.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.168.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:09:28 +0200 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-168-229.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:09:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:09:12 +1000 Message-ID: References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140731211239.0eb282cb@pomiot.lan> <53DBC854.9000607@gentoo.org> <53DBD069.5060302@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-168-229.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <53DBD069.5060302@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3e135ee5-c61d-49e9-a9e8-3b8a5b3adaa6 X-Archives-Hash: 1efecf76ad72e6f1ae4135d6c162f1e9 On 08/02/2014 03:37 AM, hasufell wrote: > Michael Palimaka: >> On 08/02/2014 03:03 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> Michael Palimaka: >>>> >>>> but we need something [...] to avoid unnecessary rebuilds. >>>> >>> >>> People are already working on it. Join them if you find that it's an >>> important issue instead of forcing council votes that rather discourage >>> further efforts. >>> >>> >> Where are they working on it? We wouldn't have half this issue in the >> first place if things were happening out in the open instead of behind >> closed doors. >> >> > > Last I checked both the #gentoo-portage channel where portage meetings > are held and the portage-devel ML are open. > > Check those channels out. I monitor both those channels and have yet to see anything about work towards avoiding unnecessary rebuilds. Please be more specific.