From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C0D13877A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96B77E088D; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13BCCE088C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115C33400B0 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.278 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.092, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xqwgua_x3CEL for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFA033FD91 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XCoim-00041Y-AU for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:40:32 +0200 Received: from ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.216.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:40:32 +0200 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:40:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:40:16 +1000 Message-ID: References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1901231.LPrcrkj2db@kailua> <1922162.cLrbk3D9LS@kailua> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 37212539-8b5c-4978-a7c0-e0247e6b2ad3 X-Archives-Hash: 2105e1a1b53e27ba8def99d720bf8d85 On 07/31/2014 08:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > Some options open to the council are: > 1. Let the games project keep its policy, and anybody who wants to > change this has to join the project and call for elections (the > council can shoe-horn members onto the project if necessary). > 2. Directly tweak games policy but preserve the project and its > scope. So, games would still have to adhere to games project policy, > but the Council might change specific policies (use of eclass, group, > etc). > 3. Restrict the games project scope, such as giving it authority if > the package maintainer elects to put it in the games herd. > 4. Do nothing. Do options 1 and 2 mean endorsing the Games project as "special" (eg. like QA or ComRel)? This is concerning, and not in the spirit of GLEP 39. Options 3 and 4 are the same. Nobody has yet been able to provide any evidence that the Games team has any elevated authority since GLEP 39 was implemented.