From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2400-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54791381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18A56E0D99;
	Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DDBE0D97
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B003433DD37
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
	tests=[AWL=0.634, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.373,
	SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id xOAz2fxJUBWu for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB68633DD5C
	for <gentoo-project@gentoo.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2013 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <glgp-gentoo-project@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1UOrBM-0008UR-UK
	for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200
Received: from ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.51.162])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-project@gentoo.org>; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200
Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-project@gentoo.org>; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 01:06:45 +1000
Message-ID: <kjs224$b4s$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20831.474.441795.677277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130406200511.01d4c0e9@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <20130407082718.3e7d961f@googlemail.com> <CAG2jQ8iokAeiV_o9aUN+RNyoKmndgpGRsXXeyf6LZFssYEPGUA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
In-Reply-To: <CAG2jQ8iokAeiV_o9aUN+RNyoKmndgpGRsXXeyf6LZFssYEPGUA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: a60988c5-d23d-49b2-a096-4d940fb7b050
X-Archives-Hash: 50d31b0fa2f9c9c50b8e4eb7f8146910

On 7/04/2013 20:13, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I see no reason to break something that works just fine as it is.

That is a fallacy. There are good reasons not to bump EAPI of toolchain 
packages in-place, the above is not one of them.