From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54791381F3 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18A56E0D99; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DDBE0D97 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B003433DD37 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.741 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.634, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.373, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOAz2fxJUBWu for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB68633DD5C for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOrBM-0008UR-UK for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200 Received: from ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.51.162]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:07:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 01:06:45 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20831.474.441795.677277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130406200511.01d4c0e9@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <20130407082718.3e7d961f@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-51-162.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: a60988c5-d23d-49b2-a096-4d940fb7b050 X-Archives-Hash: 50d31b0fa2f9c9c50b8e4eb7f8146910 On 7/04/2013 20:13, Markos Chandras wrote: > I see no reason to break something that works just fine as it is. That is a fallacy. There are good reasons not to bump EAPI of toolchain packages in-place, the above is not one of them.