From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9L3I-0001L7-GH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0617E051B; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B43EE051B for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF0C675CC for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.128 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.128 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.404, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxgiYGbylY9e for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F8467691 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K9L2b-0002S1-GN for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:09 +0000 Received: from 212.126.163.234 ([212.126.163.234]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:09 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by 212.126.163.234 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:23:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] GLEP Purpose and Guidelines Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.project Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:22:54 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <1213883654.5167.87.camel@camobap> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.126.163.234 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8046d00b-8b2f-4061-9d16-12db33b1e296 X-Archives-Hash: 94dda628547bd1e90053171607d8de6f Peter Volkov wrote: > ? ???, 17/06/2008 ? 09:48 +0200, Tiziano M=FCller ?????: >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-glep.txt >=20 > ?Your GLEP describes only two possible types: Technical and > Organizational. Yes. > At the same time type of your GLEP is informational. I can't use the new types since I have to write the GLEP in terms of the current GLEP system/types. > How =20 > this could be? What happens with informational GLEPs? The current ones remain as they are. New ones should be one of the mentio= ned types. >=20 > Why did you dropped motivation from the body while mentioning it in > workflow? There must be a motivation. But the motivation could also be made clear i= n the abstract. In other words: There must not be a separate section "motivation" to make the motivation clear. > ?What about previous copyright claim?=20 What do you mean? (yes, in my proposal a "Credits" section is needed) >=20 > Actually this is just a beginning of questions and generally it feels > this glep is not finished true, by intention. Just keep them coming. > and should borrow more ideas from the current=20 > GLEP 1. It's even better to update GLEP 1 instead for writing new one..= . No. A GLEP should not be updated (besides trivial updates). That's one of the things I'm trying to make clear here. It's not good at all to have th= e GLEPs describing policies, they should only be used to propose/describe changes to our policies (example: even if some country's law system is based on the roman right you also don't get a copy of the roman right and= a book with changes made to it if you want to look at the current right). In other words: GLEPs should only be patches or changesets. --=20 gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list