From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8W6s-0000oD-EF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4543FE0230; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AEDE0230 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1C4670DC for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.087 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.087 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.445, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v964P65E+eGr for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5060C670D2 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K8W6k-0005gx-JV for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:02 +0000 Received: from 212.126.163.234 ([212.126.163.234]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:02 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by 212.126.163.234 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:00:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-project] [GLEP] Re-Defining team and herd Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.project Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:54:46 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.126.163.234 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: e3dd5079-bdb3-4a67-b5f0-a99bb033e57b X-Archives-Hash: 5232774d40a6dafb6f6c315bf014dbc4 And yet another GLEP. This time it's about our herd and team structure: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-team.html http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-team.txt >From the GLEP: *snip* The biggest differences to the current system are: * A team is not implicitly defined as the people who maintain the packages in a certain herd * A herd is really only a logical unit of packages and may therefore _not_ possess any ressources * A team may maintain more than one herd (respectively the packages within them) *snip* Cheers, Tiziano -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list