From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JwOoN-00016x-4i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D3AE0458; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8744E0458 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C69266087 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.186 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.186 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.696, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khSQ+USkZfB8 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5176166EA0 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JwOo4-0001gl-Ep for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:40 +0000 Received: from 91.85.160.244 ([91.85.160.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:40 +0000 Received: from slong by 91.85.160.244 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 21:46:40 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Another 2 bite the dust Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:42:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9e0cf0bf0805122333v249e6b86q6dc8fb8a59e732da@mail.gmail.com> <7c612fc60805141402s79fb170bt4f310b052e9936db@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.85.160.244 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 98dd8e83-8ef2-499c-9b54-9aa31a874f56 X-Archives-Hash: 0e97c02aefc4efe5eb27095f0c730bce Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Steve Long >>> Jacub, one of the best developers around that actually cared about the >>> service we provide to our users was suspended while trying to do so, >>> and now he is not active anymore. >>> >> Yeah they'll fsck up quick without him imo. They did when they suspended >> him, and they weren't exactly gracious about asking him back, despite >> their clear desperation. Seems like pride is the hardest thing to swallow >> ;) > > Jakub was not suspended. Please stop the FUD, this is going too far. > He suddenly disappeared and we've actively been trying to get in touch > with him since then. Er this time yeah. Last time, when he was suspended the show collapsed a lot quicker than this time. So yeah, it's better than it was, which simply indicates he can now take a holiday. > Gentoo can easily live without him, but we're > worried now as he also does not appear in non-Gentoo irc channels he > used to be in. > > You've just lost another opportunity to shut up and not look > ridiculous in public. > Thanks for the professional approach you take to representing Gentoo, and well done for forgetting that jakub was suspended previously, even though the OP mentioned it. Bravo! -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list