From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JqHcp-00063i-HS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86800E034D; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54405E034D for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2464666EC for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.121 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zg8flkob6omo for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AAF665C9 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JqHcX-0001IL-9U for gentoo-project@gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:29 +0000 Received: from 91.84.165.251 ([91.84.165.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:29 +0000 Received: from slong by 91.84.165.251 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:53:29 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] DevRel policy update Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.project Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:52:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200804272206.30508.philantrop@gentoo.org> <4814F876.7040000@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.84.165.251 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2ca53ded-53c5-45e8-a384-860258e5f53e X-Archives-Hash: a1213da49314e5b6f3a3dd37f22032d3 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > Wulf C. Krueger kirjoitti: >> How to gain power the easy way and obsolete conflict resolution in jus= t >> one commit: >>=20 >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/devrel/pol= icy.xml?r1=3D1.18&r2=3D1.19 >>=20 >=20 > Please use the appropriate mailing list. Nothing technical here. This > thread belongs to -project. >=20 Indeed. I agree it simply clarifies the existing policy, in that devrel l= ead or infra previously had a call on whether an issue were critical. It'll still be transparent and a lead who used that power lightly would s= oon get relieved of duty one would hope. (If not kick up a stink then, not no= w, as nothing's really changed.) --=20 gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list