From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: forum-mods@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Appeals of Moderation Decisions
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:47:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9c7f661-e5ed-596f-266e-d7a8e095f3b9@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mar=dqRCHZqhsM4jE0oNyS9MXjsZ6MCjRem8Bvcb91LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Rich Freeman schrieb:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:38 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> <chithanh@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> A compromise / an alternative to removing OTW (if deemed a bad thing) would
>> be to limit its public reach by allowing only registered forum users to
>> access it.
>>
> If it isn't a bad thing, then why would we want to hide it? If it is
> a bad thing, why would we want to stop merely at hiding our shame?
Some things can be both good and bad at the same time. The argument that
I have read so far is that "OTW is a mess that reflects on Gentoo as a
whole". If/when that is substantiated would give rise to the next
question, how to limit the badness? Are there ways that are almost as
effective as removing OTW entirely and would cause less drama?
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-05 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 16:28 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-02-10 Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-01-31 19:11 ` Rich Freeman
2019-01-31 19:18 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-01-31 19:27 ` [gentoo-project] Appeals of Moderation Decisions Rich Freeman
2019-01-31 23:21 ` Raymond Jennings
2019-02-02 6:38 ` desultory
2019-02-02 7:06 ` Raymond Jennings
2019-02-02 6:34 ` desultory
2019-02-02 13:41 ` Rich Freeman
2019-02-03 4:22 ` desultory
2019-02-03 11:44 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2019-02-03 12:23 ` Michał Górny
2019-02-04 4:56 ` desultory
2019-02-04 5:39 ` Michał Górny
2019-02-05 5:01 ` desultory
2019-02-03 13:41 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-03 13:53 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2019-02-03 14:26 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-03 15:51 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-04 1:38 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2019-02-04 4:59 ` desultory
2019-02-04 13:05 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2019-02-05 13:05 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2019-02-05 13:05 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-05 13:17 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2019-02-04 13:45 ` Rich Freeman
2019-02-05 5:01 ` desultory
2019-02-05 12:47 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn [this message]
2019-02-04 4:58 ` desultory
2019-02-04 4:57 ` desultory
2019-02-03 11:53 ` Rich Freeman
2019-02-04 5:05 ` desultory
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9c7f661-e5ed-596f-266e-d7a8e095f3b9@gentoo.org \
--to=chithanh@gentoo.org \
--cc=forum-mods@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox