From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1785138334 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1721E099C; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A932AE0934 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083AF3423D3; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:55:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190426162953.459cbf59@gentoo.org> References: <20190412144043.5010-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <22bf7f73eadd0504bc55df189778bde21d076042.camel@gentoo.org> <20190426162953.459cbf59@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mtyzYklB7AIaE9Shp2Ld" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 05f7614f-dafb-47bb-bdbe-3c39ff5870c8 X-Archives-Hash: 099f96996957f318259ae08a9f39dd4c --=-mtyzYklB7AIaE9Shp2Ld Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 16:29 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:25:57 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > Why do you > > presume that ComRel will never abuse its power, and at the same time > > presume QA will kick people 'on a whim'? >=20 > comrel does not create any rule. QA does. That's called separation of > powers. If you follow that logic, we end up with ComRel deciding to punish people based on the private opinions of its members rather than established rules. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-mtyzYklB7AIaE9Shp2Ld Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEXr8g+Zb7PCLMb8pAur8dX/jIEQoFAlzDG/1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDVF QkYyMEY5OTZGQjNDMjJDQzZGQ0E0MEJBQkYxRDVGRjhDODExMEEACgkQur8dX/jI EQp35A/8DIDTEBg5KIHvaxRJNowQvvlJD2emWKTdyXkkKRCyseMloOrszpFYDdxO kVyJkBWiaUO1lvLMcI9FZcmu5g6I7YbKEHKibqZfxihWNtMe+KrjsyBNNJRMc5T4 c7Z8ZM8IBHn7ilSr63wKV+xtUmfHPteyLk1vi+cnKPt3BHNHhQW0Jr38+EeCauhU 6hZ2RHnbU4O1esobEf4vwjT5TtD08fjaHeBw0GVAiSx2esslIU3Q6jWmyBuXWfC4 01QBWFoQZ9DTzaahprEcTMbGvZ7spRqg521VIIMGVpWTUJA7k2rYdA7TTGMLLTbu Z87HhWF5yUKhsfn8lJHbL08Tr2DcxAwIT4hPNPSNDSycwpOALYPeblwQnxNc8yO5 Vopm+V4UzgM5eQ8DTB9GLPwLmAkKq6a7e3CsG3POaUqm1oZH5+kwppRX9hCXaKb8 EUgYFnHvD1+HqB2aFORCplSGK32ToR/u6oP4bRt9G43FGGTRRR5wFUFbWD60sLL2 CJTuWKdD2s21ljqltF1Ht3tAPWE95IQj6pUUGHfOW2oRlPYYZybfmuuFekHHlNUb z6o6B9ut0fOwj1nZ4NE5Ly/YOZE102F4xdV6PsJHm69HDMF7sNZa856Tqph518DS bfhFUtER7k237OJnNvpTA2GS/lZaTiNHTVcpqGjipeGn4He9Sd4= =nEjv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mtyzYklB7AIaE9Shp2Ld--