From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8472E1382C5 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BE59E0BAC; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FC5E0AC2 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49] (2001-44b8-4197-2800-a37a-5ec1-db17-1e49.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kensington) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DEA3335C65 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-02-11 References: <23149.51865.998621.918722@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1517247177.1187.12.camel@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 21:02:55 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1517247177.1187.12.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c3ddeff2-704f-4de1-8fb6-94025059a3d4 X-Archives-Hash: c3d627b899416bcadf8743769320f86c On 01/30/2018 04:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > 2. Continuation on mailing list posting restrictions > ==================================================== > > We haven't enforced the gentoo-dev posting restrictions so far. I have > been approached by a user yesterday who wrongly thought he couldn't post > to the list. I think this situation is at least confusing. > > I believe we should either withdraw the earlier decision and explicitly > announce that posting to gentoo-dev will not be restricted to avoid > further confusion, or enforce it (how?). > > That said, I think the list has improved for now, so maybe we don't need > to do that after all. Especially given the upcoming possibility of > Proctors revival and/or moderation via mailman. > I'd just like to voice my support for withdrawing the earlier decision and keeping the mailing list open to all. Open communication channels are critical for maintaining an open community.