From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D55D138350 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB571E095E; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74D05E094E for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c142-245.icpnet.pl [85.221.142.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7091A34EC67; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: rfc: comrel changes From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: comrel Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:23:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200218000847.GA9147@linux1.home> References: <20200217161812.GA5969@linux1.home> <20200218000847.GA9147@linux1.home> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nJ/3o8Q4QX+ygDRKbW/g" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: cdd8823a-3328-4a64-aa28-a81abf052d85 X-Archives-Hash: fc41c5aac3af7c7e98da97f0f58d25e7 --=-nJ/3o8Q4QX+ygDRKbW/g Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 18:08 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:43:06AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > I think this is all very reasonable. I've both been in the position of > > having (multiple) reports to ComRel ignored and also on the inside of > > ComRel and seen reports languish. > >=20 > > I hope monthly reports can act as a forcing function for ComRel to be > > more attentive. > =20 > I am currently waiting for the glep editors to number my pre-glep. once > that happens, I'll start another thread with the glep. >=20 Pre-GLEPs don't need numbers. We don't assign a number before the first draft. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-nJ/3o8Q4QX+ygDRKbW/g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl5LdNRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA5/xgf9FLFTrGVWeeIbdOAYrioLCLLjhGcTuMZOR3krfO70zdcIeknGbrd9+4iV TcOF8mGjFCdCCgC2an6uSEz0Z2tkvDr62egAdq76FE2mZ/g4UKY1p0C3w0LZDSY4 XEkZnLXhhu2hIMUbBDDnPoPKWQlOXoUgAbpNKCEgGSLOEmhV2vOOffEDvAB+6h4D 66qv39jctGJhFnI5lnZvFKl+ZE640zFAH7qUlJR/Uo3vkO+sw4kypVoaOp+bP4MF WxT0Thb6ynmIPfnUz/bacNop6RKE7TuP/WWBj63oAzZOgVDCvmuClTbVM12Q+BIT evY8GLhky95HagpToIDQgy/gWutNDQ== =9S4J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nJ/3o8Q4QX+ygDRKbW/g--