From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDA81396D0 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB0AE0BF6; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80ACE0BEC; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.100.0.22] (host-37-191-226-104.lynet.no [37.191.226.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2ED0341788; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Git workflow GLEP (Was: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items, council meeting 8/October/2017 18:00 UTC) To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , gentoo dev announce Cc: council@gentoo.org References: <2032312.gCecMtFXeN@porto> <1506452291.25101.14.camel@gentoo.org> <1506540293.1169.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1506627995.15843.5.camel@gentoo.org> <559f083a-8d97-8a66-b917-e318227d8d33@gentoo.org> <1506629873.15843.7.camel@gentoo.org> From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:45:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1506629873.15843.7.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E19klf2WIboFdlQRJpC7mjFrgeco3RBnG" X-Archives-Salt: 48b05c97-5a58-4bab-94ff-84e49fb9e0a5 X-Archives-Hash: 2790ae371887e2680c2cd06bbeb9439b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --E19klf2WIboFdlQRJpC7mjFrgeco3RBnG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fqwXKH10ugvWdgvkeQsfIGNDFvLBXIVai"; protected-headers="v1" From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Reply-To: k_f@gentoo.org To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , gentoo dev announce Cc: council@gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Git workflow GLEP (Was: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items, council meeting 8/October/2017 18:00 UTC) References: <2032312.gCecMtFXeN@porto> <1506452291.25101.14.camel@gentoo.org> <1506540293.1169.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1506627995.15843.5.camel@gentoo.org> <559f083a-8d97-8a66-b917-e318227d8d33@gentoo.org> <1506629873.15843.7.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1506629873.15843.7.camel@gentoo.org> --fqwXKH10ugvWdgvkeQsfIGNDFvLBXIVai Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/28/2017 10:17 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >>>> If so (c) is there >>>> a benefit in using a full URI for Bug; or should this be reduced to = only >>>> the number, >>> Only full URIs are acceptable. Numbers are ambiguous. The repository >>> and commits within it are mirrored to various sources, can be include= d >>> in external repositories and so on. We don't want to start closing >>> accidental bugs all over the place just because someone cherry-picked= >>> a commit without escaping all references Gentoo developers left. >>> >> Which could also be seen as an argument for Gentoo-Bug: XXXXXX >> > And then Gentoo-Closes, Debian-Closes, Fancybuntu-Closes, My-Fun- > Upstream-Tracker-Bug... Not really, Closes is already used for multiple providers of infrastructure such as Bitbucket and GitHub, so here URI is anyways needed and isn't specific to Gentoo. Debian bug wouldn't be closed by us to begin with, but it'd fit into a generic Reference: tag if we pulled a patch from it or it discusses it somehow. Ditto for upstream, that goes in Reference as well --=20 Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 --fqwXKH10ugvWdgvkeQsfIGNDFvLBXIVai-- --E19klf2WIboFdlQRJpC7mjFrgeco3RBnG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtOrRIMf4mkrqRycHJQt6/tY3nYUFAlnOQHgACgkQJQt6/tY3 nYW/iQgAktWfhfafTAGm0aJkV1FiMYJg9QqFfzn6vg2ToL3pua+zariJhW2uOg3+ e09ALEr/K5GCgCzriVZ+KxxPczhN1pjcz8hvdQ0FpiNKnatjoDvdARoR1us+hOkx a753cdV0x+SEHpLACnuCjMy5YBkZsPvsJ4ZH4l5wpT8FQLsXyWrggtvoawgTEvCQ B2uCHm8oijmw/a5XzJFRTbW23WwaNpTSe+4tvmtLanrcg8O2efI2jbvLTBcYw887 6V+5WLjliom+kSowOC42RqrnXYL+6oKaB+IqyuU1K04eFb9kfhe2y/fc0BXG/pmC 1r/lBQisO5AcMMuihYwyvhSFJPbYnw== =rXlK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E19klf2WIboFdlQRJpC7mjFrgeco3RBnG--