From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D352138334 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 06:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15090E0828; Sun, 5 May 2019 06:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F2EE0826; Sun, 5 May 2019 06:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8655E343641; Sun, 5 May 2019 06:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-05-12 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev-announce@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 08:51:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d1a9da82-a762-45ec-9953-918ea6d8de25 X-Archives-Hash: d0358901301850b6e41f0ae9d26cef36 On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 00:42 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > to discuss or vote on. > > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). > I would like to request the Council to vote on making 17.1 profiles stable. The profiles were present for a 1.5 yr now, and are in dev for half a year. The most important obstacles on the course to migration have been removed, the remaining bugs being either 'cleanup to be done once we switch' or dead packages. If large number of stable profiles is the problem, I'd suggest marking 17.0 dev simultaneously. This shouldn't cause any major problems since breakage relating to one category of profiles and not the other is rather unlikely, and responsible devs use 'repoman full -d' anyway. -- Best regards, Michał Górny