From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Aggregated status whiteboard for projects
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:44:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ceba586cf11b33702368b053c874b0bcee5179bd.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d068130c-765a-466e-c39b-217cfa91e3fe@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1825 bytes --]
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 15:39 +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 6/4/19 2:35 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Right now we lack a consisted aggregated source of project status. Some
> > projects report their progress via website news, some use various
> > mailing lists, some don't report status at all. I'd like to propose
> > a new method for publishing an opt-in 'status whiteboard' for projects.
> >
> > The idea is to create a special template on wiki. The projects
> > interested in publishing their status would use the template to put it
> > on the page. As a result, besides being published as part of project
> > page it would be aggregated for machine processing.
> >
> > Then, we'd create a simple aggregated listing of all projects publishing
> > their status.
>
> This sounds a bit vague currently, and for me it's quite hard to imagine
> what you exactly mean. Maybe some simple mock-up would help to explain
> it better? Is the "status" indicator simply 'active/inactive'? Do you
> write your own goals and then set it 'in good health / behind intended
> progress'? How does it get defined, automatically or manually? Because
> if it's manually written, projects can be set 'active' now but forgotten
> in weeks. If it's automatic, how does it get defined?
>
I mean having a free-form aggregated list like:
GNOME: 3.30 stable, working on 3.3x in ::gnome
LLVM: current stable 7.1.0, 8.0.1 expected on ... and stable ...
Proxy-maint: long PR backlog, currently not processing new packages
Xfce: Xfce 4.14 RC1 now in ~arch, 4.14 final expected on ...
etc. Basically anything you'd like to tell others. Possibly something
PR people can use afterwards to make news or presentations about status
of Gentoo.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 11:35 [gentoo-project] [RFC] Aggregated status whiteboard for projects Michał Górny
2019-06-17 12:39 ` Joonas Niilola
2019-06-17 12:44 ` Michał Górny [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ceba586cf11b33702368b053c874b0bcee5179bd.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox