From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B28138334 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B31AFE09C1; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6CCE09C0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F26434090F; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2019-04-14 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Ulrich Mueller , Gokturk Yuksek Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:28:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190410062712.jvgec4vhpvvo2e6v@gentoo.org> References: <4bbfc34f-335f-5521-310a-b66ffd0d9a9a@gentoo.org> <5e30d658-80c8-b608-1505-dc08db3625bf@gentoo.org> <20190403174315.32615d3b9574571e3ed4a399@gentoo.org> <80ed2e482e96c96555bf4fd9331731c4c9ad0d7f.camel@gentoo.org> <232747ba-063c-821f-a66d-5f106ed2aa82@gentoo.org> <20190410062712.jvgec4vhpvvo2e6v@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Mg1N2/kpxbQ9RK1lBswN" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 4e802e99-acf2-4696-a9e0-4c5a1a783499 X-Archives-Hash: 69f3208502745e75f540229776200926 --=-Mg1N2/kpxbQ9RK1lBswN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 15:27 +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > The 04/10/2019 07:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 09 Apr 2019, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > > > I'd like to (informally) propose the following, for which I'm willing > > > to formulate as a GLEP proposal if there is interest: > > > The Foundation has an established practice of storing the legal names > > > of developers who join under a pseudonym. The infrastructure is > > > already in place for this. I think that allowing these developers to > > > commit using their pseudonyms as long as the Foundation is informed > > > their real identity does not exacerbate the legal risks they already > > > pose. The foundation may decide their arbitrary criteria on who is > > > eligible for this type of protection, including requiring sound legal > > > reasons for them to keep their identities hidden. I understand that > > > the maintenance of this could be a burden for the Foundation in > > > theory, but in practice I suspect this number is very low already. > >=20 > > That doesn't work, because there would be no way for a person outside o= f > > the Foundation to verify such identities. > >=20 > There is no way also for foundation to check all sign-off are assigned > to real legal names. >=20 > > To clarify, I won't be opposed against making a specific exception and > > "grandfathering" any devs who had commit access before the cut-off date > > when GLEP 76 was implemented. > >=20 >=20 > I propose foundation to vote for add the use of pseudonym in the GLEP 76. > For keeping Gentoo a confortable and inclusive place. >=20 If Foundation decides to arbitrarily change a policy that's been initially approved both by Council and Foundation, then I propose that the Council rejects changes to the policy and blocks such contributions. =20 Furthermore, I will propose that we actively pursue removing Foundation from Gentoo as apparently Trustees once again are trying to abuse the power that they've only gotten because nobody else wanted to take legal risk from negligence of previous Boards. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-Mg1N2/kpxbQ9RK1lBswN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEXr8g+Zb7PCLMb8pAur8dX/jIEQoFAlytmwdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDVF QkYyMEY5OTZGQjNDMjJDQzZGQ0E0MEJBQkYxRDVGRjhDODExMEEACgkQur8dX/jI EQoDnBAA0L0TryFmp84nrnqqn2JSZaxodkV+SK2D7uEPCaHkZor36i6j0ut0Gs9W nnjKfYnWkFlI7HqHk2pcWti8QB6sYBYSIq3575HjhN7i6pZ0DzotzPj+WdSgKwdw nmnymcU/jH7c1nQBF+Zmcb7Y9G+zQ0e5rs7xcHu25DHvCxAvbWjVNAi3mV+dFe5S EmfioChk5STibjazFn7Dgcu7HhQ5Uw2U3KXCeYWIpC4afMuMjFBZfy5To9qxhsju YGIy3DI4hmxy0b0sdc5mp+Qoh3g2g8Be1ahmVL0XzEgWxQSWTrGSo81sQm9O+eol wqwSUs8QDEyNzGc6mdzgs3PgCGVUMaybTpzO59RGO95jToSySug404NySUWvz3R+ lobTNiqmBE2GishYy/Q2l9V8rgJZmc8UBqg3/lmt8A1vYPfqqGq576M84e2kO0WO XNlQ9CTfzcVyMP9rrKtnK1Z+SlJEE0wkyjLDobTXwXbTWudQjOHZHORiL6ep+yWk XYUEmEceN7GmfcalpRRe0FmbmwwUoUrMOE1EjYMg7Vub9eG0Wne8DKcKIC1ylx0X tgLEygfSFg7664kW7P8X4FeZY3HZmBO03WEqckhaR8UC9VfokgYGBzvfhUxex166 Ajz90YAP0PIDyQ2JEZSg9u+fy+8vH1uE43qgz5WRYAoOPv7cAsQ= =UDAS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Mg1N2/kpxbQ9RK1lBswN--