From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6297815808B for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FB6CE07DB; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04EDE07D1 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] utilizing GH functionality that Gentoo infra does not provide From: David Seifert To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:21:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <7540919.LM0AJKV5NW@pinacolada> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 5a736d6a-13a8-4464-96cc-c3577cdc4343 X-Archives-Hash: 3242d8b3a91a84b760abcfa0e100fa61 On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 22:01 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 29 Mar 2022 21:36, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > * possibly even Discussions since it'll provide a clear/scoped > > > space for > > > non-Gentoo users & devs. Gentoo forums are huge and require custom > > > accts, > > > and mailing lists are huge and a bit restrictive old timey. > >=20 > > eh... so it's just because it's "huge, restrictive, old timey" that > > you're never on irc? >=20 > were you trying to make a point or something ? > -mike This goes hand in hand with team work realistically only happening on IRC, and since I've joined, you've never once replied to one of my emails *ever*. Said differently: trying to work with you is nigh impossible.