From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: "René 'Necoro' Neumann" <lists@necoro.eu>
Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo <--> Sabayon Relation
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:42:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b41005390708030842p34f1beackfe1530863bc158de@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B15C0F.3020809@necoro.eu>
On 8/1/07, René 'Necoro' Neumann <lists@necoro.eu> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I'd like to discuss a topic that I know much people will use for
> trolling/flaming or similar. If you feel like this - get you a weapon
> and cool down, but please do not answer :)
>
> I start this discussion as I'm inspired by some posts at drobbin's blog.
>
> The first thing:
> What is the actual (official) attitude towards Sabayon?
What is this 'official' stuff?
I don't think Gentoo has a body that makes decisions on 'officiality'
and I don't think anyone cares anyway. Some people think Sabayon is
good, others do not. I don't think you will get an 'official
attitude', you will get the attitude of whomever you have asked.
>
> If it is as I think it is (negative) - why is it like this? Why isn't
> Sabayon treated as an official "child project"? Why is support denied
> for Sabayon Users? - I know that they have a global ~$ARCH and some
> not-so-nice hacks ;), but this shouldn't be a reason, as problems
> related to this shouldn't be the major part...
Sabayon (in my experience) has badly chosen settings in
/etc/make.conf. Those settings by default make the packages in
sabayon unsupported in a typical gentoo environment (ie you are using
gentoo but have those settings, good luck getting support from many
people).
Support in #gentoo is typically denied to sabayon users because in our
experience it's rarely a gentoo problem. It's usually a problem with
the sabayon overlay or build settings. The number of times I've
helped someone for 15 or 20 minutes only to find out they are using
sabayon and not gentoo and holy crap they have this overlay and horrid
build settings. Hey surprise, your packages didn't build. Maybe you
should use sane settings! -> makes me grr ;)
I believe you can always get support for it in the Unsupported Software forum.
So to sum up, we don't support it because it has really bad make.conf
settings (CFLAGS/LDFLAGS). It would be like saying 'we support you
using -ffast-math'. Which is false, we will tell you to rebuild your
system without -ffast-math. If you come to me with a sabayon problem,
I'll tell you to rebuild your system with sane build flags unless you
have good evidence that those flags are not the problem. Most Sabayon
users are not prepared to do that.
>
> I want just to propose, that the devs should be more open for Sabayon -
> and see it as a source of ideas and software. If lxnay will finish
> Entropy (and it helds what it is supposed ;)) - it will add a feature
> that is often asked for and always declined as "not possible". (And
> there may be other stuff ...)
>
>
> Hmm ... I had several other thoughts but forgot them during the day :/.
> So again: Only serious, constructive answers :)
>
> - -- Nec
>
> P.S.: Nope - I'm not a Sabayon User :)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGsVwP4UOg/zhYFuARAgJ7AJ4ly6n/vGhKxFby7HpvFdNyEGw96ACdF6VV
> kHM9MZIKcpQrtDS6zb37IGs=
> =JwcP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 4:22 [gentoo-project] Gentoo <--> Sabayon Relation René 'Necoro' Neumann
2007-08-02 7:33 ` Aniruddha
2007-08-02 12:29 ` [gentoo-project] " Steve Long
2007-08-02 15:51 ` Robert Buchholz
2007-08-03 6:49 ` [gentoo-project] " Steve Long
2007-08-03 15:42 ` Alec Warner [this message]
2007-08-04 16:59 ` [gentoo-project] " Steve Long
2007-08-05 20:38 ` Alec Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b41005390708030842p34f1beackfe1530863bc158de@mail.gmail.com \
--to=antarus@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=lists@necoro.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox