From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:13:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b135be8b-de54-7dec-f405-33ab674c7d86@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=RzuzUbO2XTghKWpNdijCLwPAFjcanTKbZx0+XhGFDUA@mail.gmail.com>
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:35 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> <wlt-ml@o-sinc.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, January 16, 2017 11:56:43 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> And nobody really has a choice about whether they'll handle lawsuits.
>>> If you own property, then you better have a plan for handling
>>> lawsuits. I suspect that SPI has thought this through a bit more than
>>> we have historically.
>> The SPI is not a legal management entity. You are confusing fiscal with legal.
>>
> Again, I think you're thinking I'm saying I'm not.
>
> I'm not saying that the Gentoo Foundation should retain the legal
> services of SPI. I'm saying that they should turn over their property
> to SPI and cease to exist. At that point we don't need legal
> services, because we legally don't exist.
I have been looking at the SPI website, other than managing money and
controlling assets, SPI does not appear to do anything else management
wise. Do you have a link to the SPI website that says it does what you
claim?
>>> In any case, the point is that if Gentoo moves under SPI then there
>>> would be no "Gentoo" to sue. "Gentoo" would be a trademark of SPI.
>>> Any copyrights on our works that are held centrally would belong to
>>> SPI. Our money would be stored in SPI bank accounts. So, if you want
>>> our stuff, you have to sue SPI.
>> Completely WRONG!
>>
>> "Project Independence
>> SPI does not own, govern or control the associated projects."
>> http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/relationship/
> They wouldn't own the project. They would own our assets. They
> wouldn't control anything.
>
They would own the assets but I have found nothing that says Gentoo
can't be sued still or that SPI would provide a defense for Gentoo. The
only case I can think of, if the IRS comes after Gentoo and SPI is
handling the money and paperwork. Then SPI would step in.
I'd be interested in a link that shows what you claim. I can't find it
and neither has my google searches.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-14 21:43 [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-14 23:03 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:08 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:19 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:22 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:25 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-15 20:26 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 1:16 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:28 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 21:00 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 22:23 ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-16 1:01 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:56 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:59 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:52 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 15:06 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 16:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 16:56 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 17:35 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:59 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:08 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:23 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:10 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:13 ` Dale [this message]
2017-01-16 18:19 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:25 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:46 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:58 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:13 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:46 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:52 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 19:08 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:20 ` Dale
2017-01-16 19:34 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:54 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:11 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:31 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:40 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:47 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:57 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:27 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:38 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:51 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:09 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-16 19:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:20 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:43 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:52 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:21 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:19 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:50 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:01 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:02 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:10 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:16 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-16 20:23 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 20:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2017-01-16 20:42 ` Dale
2017-01-16 21:41 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:37 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:40 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-16 18:49 ` Dale
2017-01-15 15:00 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-15 15:30 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b135be8b-de54-7dec-f405-33ab674c7d86@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox