From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@o-sinc.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:27:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <assp.01950c6ed8.4300164.CVja0r2hN0@wlt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123060559.1794bc9e@katipo2.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2405 bytes --]
On Monday, January 23, 2017 6:05:59 AM EST Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:21:12 -0500
>
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@o-sinc.com> wrote:
> > Ideas are good, but to many toss out ideas not willing to do the work. Or
> > understanding what it will take to make such ideas come to reality.
>
> Prematurely judging ideas when they're under developed based on a conjecture
> that the limited context you have so far indicates they "can't work" is
> also harmful, because it simply excludes the fact there may be some data
> you failed to consider that makes it work.
That could be said to the GLEP I asked for comments on :)
Just saying like with the Foundation, sponsoring, SPI, etc. People toss out
ideas that require considerable time to make happen. I am willing to put forth
the effort, but most are not.
Most will want to toss in their 2 cents to those doing the work. Which I am
not sure is right, because unless you are willing to donate your time. Your
opinion some what matters, but not the same. As your idea may require
considerable time that your expecting someone else do to do.
Thus if you come up with an idea you should be willing to do the work behind
such. Or maybe keep your opinion to yourself, if your not going to take part.
> Hence, it is often effective to intentionally extend through insane ideas
> as a thought exercise, in the assumption that you will discover a final
> piece of the puzzle along the way, and then only judge the ideas once
> you've gotten to a point you *must* start implementing something.
To a point. More time is lost due to indecision than wrong. You cannot make
everyone happy all the time. You can over discuss something trying to hammer
out all details so everyone is on board and get no where doing that. To the
point where it is never implemented.
The SPI/SFC has been discussed a few times. Why has that never happened? It
proves my point! You need to just do this stuff sometimes rather than
endlessly discuss. Very few who discuss it will put forth the effort.
> Culling the ideas before you even sit down and implement things leads to the
> worst decision making.
Yes, like others saying a GLEP will not work that has not be tried. Lots of
negative nancy's running around.
> It is the very definition of "Short sighted"
I think I saw reference to Gentoo in that definition :)
--
William L. Thomson Jr.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-22 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-15 7:41 [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News Matthew Marchese
2017-01-15 9:11 ` Seemant Kulleen
2017-01-15 9:36 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2017-01-15 9:43 ` Matthew Marchese
2017-01-15 14:22 ` [gentoo-project] " Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-15 22:20 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-19 21:35 ` [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 13:58 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 16:21 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 16:57 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:13 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 17:00 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:17 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 17:57 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 18:16 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 17:02 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:21 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 17:41 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:51 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-22 18:04 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:05 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-22 17:27 ` William L. Thomson Jr. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=assp.01950c6ed8.4300164.CVja0r2hN0@wlt \
--to=wlt-ml@o-sinc.com \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox