From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@o-sinc.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:13:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <assp.0191789c6b.15319939.nzAlXnJp4X@wlt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=u9Ub==e19WDamjeOZ3DrMaLh+LAXVqJEB_0KVwt7eRg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2587 bytes --]
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:05:54 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:31 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
>
> <wlt-ml@o-sinc.com> wrote:
> > It is really amazing what is tolerated, and what is considered a CoC
> > violation.
> Keep in mind that "tolerated" and "CoC violation" are different
> things.
Where does set an example for others to follow fall?
> Something can be a CoC violation and be either tolerated or
> not. There are a lot of things I'd prefer not be tolerated which are,
> and a lot of it comes down to trying to find a balance in enforcement.
Or just get rid of enforcement as it is very unfair and biased.
> The stuff that does get serious enforcement tends to be fairly
> egregious from what I've seen, and rarely are all the details of what
> actually happened the things that discussed on the lists or the things
> that are commonly known.
That is complete BS. I have never done anything severe. Go try to find evidence
of such. I can show you countless examples of clear CoC violations. I have
mentioned many on list. Yet I was banned recent in 2016 for 7 days.
None of this makes any logical sense. The criteria is not consistent.
Application and enforcement is not consistent. The whole thing is a mess.
> Put another way, from what I've observed Comrel is about as
> understaffed as any other part of Gentoo, so for them to go through
> all the trouble to actually do something to somebody, they really have
> to get their attention in a sustained way...
Or simply not be liked by those with such powers. I have seen others, which a
recent post was a perfect example of a clear CoC violation. Not to mention
creating a toxic community that is very unfriendly. While minor things get
punished.
I have never insulted someone on list. I have never talked about anyone who
was banned on list. I have not used fowl language in IRC and other things. Yet
I am not right for Gentoo yet people who do such are?
These other people who are "right" for Gentoo, have horrible attitudes,
approaches to other people, and are creating a really bad atmosphere. It is of
no wonder people are not coming to Gentoo.
I very much believe I am not the problem but many who are Developers are the
problem. Their attitudes and how they interact with others needs to change. In
order for more to be attracted to the project. This is simple logic.
No one wants to be around or work with unfriendly rude insulting people.
I am not one of those.... Explains why I am not right but others are. Makes
allot of sense.
--
William L. Thomson Jr.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-15 19:23 [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal Michał Górny
2017-01-15 19:38 ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-15 20:06 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:02 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:13 ` Kent Fredric
2017-01-15 23:05 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 17:54 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-15 21:59 ` Dale
2017-01-16 5:00 ` Dean Stephens
2017-01-15 22:55 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 0:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2017-01-16 0:44 ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-16 0:55 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 11:16 ` Jeroen Roovers
2017-01-16 19:35 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2017-01-17 17:38 ` Michał Górny
2017-01-16 4:56 ` Dean Stephens
2017-01-16 13:22 ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2017-01-16 13:40 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-17 4:30 ` Dean Stephens
2017-01-17 4:29 ` Dean Stephens
2017-01-17 17:41 ` Michał Górny
2017-01-20 5:02 ` Dean Stephens
2017-01-16 20:57 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-17 17:49 ` Michał Górny
2017-01-17 18:54 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-17 19:03 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-17 19:40 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-17 20:20 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-18 5:33 ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-18 17:07 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-17 14:38 ` Daniel Campbell
2017-01-17 15:26 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-17 18:05 ` Michał Górny
2017-01-17 18:13 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-18 17:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-18 18:25 ` Michał Górny
2017-01-18 18:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-18 19:05 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-18 19:13 ` William L. Thomson Jr. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=assp.0191789c6b.15319939.nzAlXnJp4X@wlt \
--to=wlt-ml@o-sinc.com \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox