From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C142F139085 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0E04E0DC2; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [173.230.135.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8343DE0DBF for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23497 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2017 17:09:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO assp1.obsidian-studios.com) (wlt@::ffff:127.0.0.1) by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 with ESMTPA; 6 Jan 2017 17:09:14 -0000 X-Assp-Version: 2.5.3(16294) on assp1.obsidian-studios.com X-Assp-ID: assp1.obsidian-studios.com m1-22554-06324 X-Assp-Session: 32554A43A70 (mail 1) X-Assp-Envelope-From: wlt-ml@o-sinc.com X-Assp-Intended-For: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Assp-Server-TLS: yes Received: from unknown ([fdbe:bad:a55:0:1::211] helo=wlt.localnet) by assp1.obsidian-studios.com with SMTPSA(TLSv1_2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) (2.5.3); 6 Jan 2017 12:09:14 -0500 From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Merging Trustees and Council / Developers and Foundation Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:09:10 -0500 Message-ID: Organization: Obsidian-Studios, Inc. User-Agent: KMail/5.3.3 (Linux/4.7.5-gentoo; KDE/5.28.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <57d3af79-4212-b8b9-40df-6120b1445c8b@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2638947.l9tgReItba"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7431f175-b6b8-49f6-8c80-3219aabe9d77 X-Archives-Hash: cc8c1b1df8880d293dea8417695efe18 --nextPart2638947.l9tgReItba Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, January 6, 2017 11:51:35 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I think you all are missing my experience and research into this matter. > > Again go look into -nfp archives. You will find a pretty in depth > > discussion with lots of details you all are seeking to revisit. Learn > > from the past or repeat your choice. > > I'm well-aware. When I was a Trustee it was one of the topics being > tossed around. It comes up, yet the are reasons why things have not been handed over or even an application to the SPI. It is not really beneficial to keep repeating the same topic. At some point a decision needs to be made to pursue that path or rule it out indefinitely. It detracts from thinking of alternatives. > Not saying everything you know in an email is not the same as not > realizing. It is called brevity. It is hard to be brief on some matters as you know :) -- William L. Thomson Jr. --nextPart2638947.l9tgReItba Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQTEeldqZjmVut8bVHJNcbKkg6ozUAUCWG/PNgAKCRBNcbKkg6oz UMYpAJ9XW44GwOPGfeQw6Mrb1pSjt3i32QCePHoIGzr3AR6sMnEijBGGl8NURwM= =q5mZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2638947.l9tgReItba--