From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA4C13877A for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 557A5E0AC5; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7507AE0ABC for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2127) id B03653402EA; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51F433FFC4 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:16:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2014 / 2015 election In-Reply-To: <53AB309E.7080303@mailstation.de> Message-ID: References: <539BD2E2.7030803@gentoo.org> <438e24cc-1eb1-4803-acff-f169e08f0a06@email.android.com> <1403712385.1777.0@NeddySeagoon_Static> <02d60568-cdc4-4167-945a-a42ebb5f0c1c@email.android.com> <53AB309E.7080303@mailstation.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: af9b48b7-714c-4dd1-8cca-083a506762d3 X-Archives-Hash: abddbf0e6716988fe747ebacab4e2ea5 On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 Hi Wulf. > On 25.06.2014 19:41, Chris Reffett wrote: >>> Everyone eligible to stand has been nominated. >> I think that elections team informally decided to just list people >> who had been nominated by devs, > > So, the elections team didn't like the rules they operate by and decided > "informally" to change them? No, the team didn't change any rules. I've been busy with some other stuff and so I haven't been as involved with this election as I've generally been. Unfortunately that meant more work for Chris and David. You also didn't help with your email. >> or who have officially accepted/declined (for the sake of >> simplicity/not having an enormous page). > > What about those nominated who don't actively read this list and rely > on the correctness of the elections page? I've now committed a new election page [1] that allows to address some of the issues reported and I'll be adding your entire list there. I'm currently focusing on opening the election and getting that page corrected. When I have some time, I'll add everyone missing there. [1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2014/council-201406.xml > - -- > Best regards, Wulf > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlOrMJ4ACgkQnuVXRcSi+5qIFgCfUxFNY14RKU0chpf/Z0vcY+a7 > SaoAnjp3+hTktup2hIYZ6igoGVTyTpKa > =pNfN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >