From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E332C13877A for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABD2FE0E0C; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B84FE0D33 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2127) id 19DD733FE8A; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA4B33FE35 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:00:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2014 / 2015 election In-Reply-To: <539EFC58.8060406@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <539BD2E2.7030803@gentoo.org> <539E0590.8040600@mailstation.de> <21406.51012.786836.311830@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <539EFC58.8060406@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 1e758dd7-be31-4b3b-a9a4-1d43febd38c9 X-Archives-Hash: 4992e8df3c52213f96d2558b6a02dbcf On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 16/06/14 06:30 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Right, anyone can nominate. However, if someone is nominating >> everyone who is eligible (with the exception of one developer), >> then I would see this as a clear abuse of the rule. >> >> So, to make sure if I understand this right, you do consider these >> nominations as valid? >> >> Ulrich >> > > > It is permitted, though, right? > > I think in terms of expediency, however, we should take an "opt-in" > approach, that is only those who want to run should post acceptances > and otherwise we don't worry about/require/recommend posting/seek > declinations. The rules already state that anyone that wants to run for an election needs to accept the nomination. So, I'd kindly like to ask everyone to stop arguing about Wulf's email and only those that wish to run to accept the nomination. If you don't want to accept the nomination, don't do anything, when the nomination period finishes, we'll consider that as refusal to accept the nomination. To all the others that are upset because everyone is already nominated, I'd like to recall everyone if free to nominate. It is custom practice to have developers nominated more than once. Before anyone asks, that is also valid under the current rules. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlOe/FgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPClwQD/cmsXVOnQHBB1MCQf6fY6GuET > BXA7cJFUX+GvNT3ccwwA/RpsIX1f8hl/qtU9eGsIT6IgDRWkkvDhKHRmpBZiW2UL > =V5Bn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Regards, Jorge