From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-7467-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819881382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2018 20:28:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B9AAE0F40;
	Mon,  2 Apr 2018 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from avasout06.plus.net (avasout06.plus.net [212.159.14.18])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CEA2E0F3F
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2018 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.6.147] ([212.159.46.162])
	by smtp with ESMTP
	id 363hfcYZcy3ji363ifh5iF; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 21:28:06 +0100
X-CM-Score: 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=fL8XI6Se c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=RuViaDnnNG9rfPLW4VJocg==:117 a=RuViaDnnNG9rfPLW4VJocg==:17
 a=13zjGPudsaEWiJwPRgMA:9 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8
 a=yDeqBlexa2zJZHPhIiAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8
 a=rPpvi_JCaKW5IiA0dXkA:9 a=UozS-lAA3OmNZMs2:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10
 a=Cnj9kBTb0BUuUtlYEVEA:9 a=ONNS8QRKHyMA:10 a=wa9RWnbW_A1YIeRBVszw:22
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
References: <CAPDOV4_SSJwHv2YuBA=Ph1dpqWboGXtKT8D2NG25Pzbi9HSf6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDOV49Ybvpj6AX6TT5q7b_oRTtbDT5gBAdNFEumtOjw2mN=qA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522677230.14250.62.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4__P+bFLr4DGmSaVTY_B+pGn3Wh5BdOHu+a2m06OfcC7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522693222.2542.20.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAAD4mYj7ifpo0ojzTfdA2ZjGnOmFwPXqqTNm+-Lu6fdDQZ4aug@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522698735.2542.35.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4_k9_V6p5VHzEKT-9NmKrsbRfTMMaGBXeHT-9i2EcD2cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <96152e70-6672-e872-ce20-254ee4e364e0@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4-d=a8L_1oXuDc1QrXQ8HvnprS8x_5ffftXDZRksbtMoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
Openpgp: id=BA266E0525CFAB101523351B4C30334F93C22371
Message-ID: <ab1eee12-7e6a-3d1c-b6e8-01411fb6ad76@iee.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 21:28:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOV4-d=a8L_1oXuDc1QrXQ8HvnprS8x_5ffftXDZRksbtMoA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="tVKqiMCicVuoqr3jxFvrarQvp7nE4qntT"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEeIifVnNloOsMckDTLNtuVW+RG++BaeNzK8uBPHLiw6LDRiEfnu1BxYKVi048gN03CbqAQyVZSsYxalt7ZIm0MrzPpvO26wVcJm3NIsiR/OaJKO20XC
 bkaVOxhbzVI2SoSUvX7nswRDJ2/x5nrjg5ehHXSACgtIc9FzeSjdWKSO1JGLAcwYpNAjKR4ChMdz2Q==
X-Archives-Salt: f6782eb9-a4b9-42d8-873d-fcbb5b2d9d3a
X-Archives-Hash: 753d7a17e31bfd5d0be444d88278023d

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--tVKqiMCicVuoqr3jxFvrarQvp7nE4qntT
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lGAPzFtxDAycF9L7qMcNgLhBkvQ5OLYaF";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@iee.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <ab1eee12-7e6a-3d1c-b6e8-01411fb6ad76@iee.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof
References: <CAPDOV4_SSJwHv2YuBA=Ph1dpqWboGXtKT8D2NG25Pzbi9HSf6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDOV49Ybvpj6AX6TT5q7b_oRTtbDT5gBAdNFEumtOjw2mN=qA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522677230.14250.62.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4__P+bFLr4DGmSaVTY_B+pGn3Wh5BdOHu+a2m06OfcC7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522693222.2542.20.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAAD4mYj7ifpo0ojzTfdA2ZjGnOmFwPXqqTNm+-Lu6fdDQZ4aug@mail.gmail.com>
 <1522698735.2542.35.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4_k9_V6p5VHzEKT-9NmKrsbRfTMMaGBXeHT-9i2EcD2cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <96152e70-6672-e872-ce20-254ee4e364e0@gentoo.org>
 <CAPDOV4-d=a8L_1oXuDc1QrXQ8HvnprS8x_5ffftXDZRksbtMoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOV4-d=a8L_1oXuDc1QrXQ8HvnprS8x_5ffftXDZRksbtMoA@mail.gmail.com>

--lGAPzFtxDAycF9L7qMcNgLhBkvQ5OLYaF
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------A946BA7E239B7B2A31BFB354"
Content-Language: en-GB

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------A946BA7E239B7B2A31BFB354
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 02/04/18 21:21, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85=
n
> <chithanh@gentoo.org <mailto:chithanh@gentoo.org>> wrote:
>
>     Daniel Robbins schrieb:
>     > I think this is a very good post. I am willing to abide by whatev=
er standards
>     > of conduct that mgorny and ulm are subject to. Right no, that
>     standard is
>     > "nada". If that changes, I will happily tone down the rhetoric.
>
>     No, I think that this is not enough. Even in the face of others
>     engaging in
>     misconduct or displaying blatant disregard for rules (and I am not
>     accusing
>     anyone here), we should stay civil and show our best behavior.
>
>
> It is interesting that Gentoo comrel clamps down immediately on
> violations of outsiders, but chronically ignores ongoing violations
> from Council members.
>
> I wonder why that is?
>
> -Daniel=C2=A0
Possibly because developers vote for council, and either
support/ratify/condone their behaviour ..

I won't add anything about anyone being 'in their pockets' though ..

Oops...

--------------A946BA7E239B7B2A31BFB354
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf=
-8">
  </head>
  <body text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
    On 02/04/18 21:21, Daniel Robbins wrote:<br>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite"
cite=3D"mid:CAPDOV4-d=3Da8L_1oXuDc1QrXQ8HvnprS8x_5ffftXDZRksbtMoA@mail.gm=
ail.com">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div class=3D"gmail_extra">
          <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:20 PM,
            Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a
                href=3D"mailto:chithanh@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank"
                moz-do-not-send=3D"true">chithanh@gentoo.org</a>&gt;</spa=
n>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Daniel
              Robbins schrieb:<br>
              <span class=3D"">&gt; I think this is a very good post. I a=
m
                willing to abide by whatever standards<br>
                &gt; of conduct that mgorny and ulm are subject to.
                Right no, that standard is<br>
                &gt; "nada". If that changes, I will happily tone down
                the rhetoric.<br>
                <br>
              </span>No, I think that this is not enough. Even in the
              face of others engaging in<br>
              misconduct or displaying blatant disregard for rules (and
              I am not accusing<br>
              anyone here), we should stay civil and show our best
              behavior.<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>It is interesting that Gentoo comrel clamps down
              immediately on violations of outsiders, but chronically
              ignores ongoing violations from Council members.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>I wonder why that is?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>-Daniel=C2=A0</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Possibly because developers vote for council, and either
    support/ratify/condone their behaviour ..<br>
    <br>
    I won't add anything about anyone being 'in their pockets' though ..
    <br>
    <br>
    Oops...<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------A946BA7E239B7B2A31BFB354--

--lGAPzFtxDAycF9L7qMcNgLhBkvQ5OLYaF--

--tVKqiMCicVuoqr3jxFvrarQvp7nE4qntT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Wq7I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tVKqiMCicVuoqr3jxFvrarQvp7nE4qntT--