From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2545B1382C5 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 510D9E08A2; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210CEE08A0 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> From: Thomas Deutschmann Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 21:07:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="70NfGaVZNVawJ6bN4FAB4b7qK1RBHMObl" X-Archives-Salt: ac009aea-5260-47cb-9c0c-3bb972eba286 X-Archives-Hash: 4943dd2de4159fa2448190dc0ab38881 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --70NfGaVZNVawJ6bN4FAB4b7qK1RBHMObl Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qO7zQtzyjKmOuuGAI3xp5M0wmoeuu7YhU"; protected-headers="v1" From: Thomas Deutschmann To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09 References: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> In-Reply-To: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> --qO7zQtzyjKmOuuGAI3xp5M0wmoeuu7YhU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 2021-05-01 17:14, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > There's rumors going around that Agostino's tinderbox basically > already burned through our entire 2021 AWS Open Source credit budget > and has overdrawn it significantly. >=20 > Independent of whether this rumor is true or not, I would like to > discuss > * how we can avoid such a situation in the future, > * and how we can fairly handle the distribution of limited infra > resources that may end up costing us money Is this really a topic for council? Isn't foundation an independent body and if someone requests funding=20 from foundation and will get it approved... Or in other words: Can council veto against funding requests the=20 foundation received and wants to approve? If not, I really see nothing to discuss for council and non-foundation=20 members. It's their money... --=20 Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 --qO7zQtzyjKmOuuGAI3xp5M0wmoeuu7YhU-- --70NfGaVZNVawJ6bN4FAB4b7qK1RBHMObl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEExKRzo+LDXJgXHuURObr3Jv2BVkFAmCO+F8FAwAAAAAACgkQRObr3Jv2BVks kwgAiCYT85k6PfvHx1z2O8jnFRKqn6056RuVsJwrx5ttwn6M0U1Iea6BGlR9bYpJTr9KU+v0rtwY Kz/Ng2zo5Ih02l/+LSui6r6Ib+4p4W02KUVVeTG/7S4SXE5Ke3qu04W3fWSEC6erdprm+V83rBZZ +CajgvL3Nht6DC/yIfpVywFsQtrWbLIkV8ViLltmQOgQSLZmd1emK36MIGyaaVTjltX7mNCbPJRA +SaDFM9PGqW3NvrfY/Bifom+wlkXxIyNwi4Ak2lgerJWDtZ7l3VTUfW/c4hg4gYTAKgvwLgC8b3J Hix90qBwcrxlPjSUs7RUS/XXWhjthO08dDkewBRMOg== =K3aM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --70NfGaVZNVawJ6bN4FAB4b7qK1RBHMObl--