From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E318158649 for ; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AEEEE090E; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA73EE090E for ; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:40:01 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= References: <905f8802eb6da5a3463022275d5e694dbc4adefd.camel@gentoo.org> Cc: council@gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Florian Schmaus Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council Meeting 2023-05-14: Agenda In-Reply-To: <905f8802eb6da5a3463022275d5e694dbc4adefd.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 90a858da-1b4f-48c7-9775-21e882ac095a X-Archives-Hash: 5c49ecbde2f6b43f7f5105a83f0bf018 Hi Michał, On 12.05.23 14:27, Michał Górny wrote: > The next Council meeting will be on Sunday 2023-05-14, 19:00 UTC in the > #gentoo-council channel on Libera Chat. > > Agenda: > > 1. Roll call > 2. Mark GLEP 78 as final [1,2] > 3. Open bugs with Council participation [3] > 4. Open floor Is there a reason why the request to council to vote on whether EGO_SUM should be reinstated ("un-deprecated") or not, did not make it on the agenda? - Flow