From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0811382C5 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 14:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A411E0827; Mon, 3 May 2021 14:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D2BE0814 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 5567 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 03 May 2021 14:31:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 09:31:48 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> <00d9f2b305889294210bb01748d2045a0cd603f0.camel@gentoo.org> <0f1ee1c3d7e95cc5fbd0e36807ffdde20b26512b.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yiCuR3z6u6h1cJ3c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f1ee1c3d7e95cc5fbd0e36807ffdde20b26512b.camel@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ed634df7-77ca-461f-88cc-e61ac81fa3f0 X-Archives-Hash: 2d8c1a8ed97eca82d1baea4565a3b5fc --yiCuR3z6u6h1cJ3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 11:15 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 03 May 2021, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >=20 > > > On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > The way I see it is, if the council wants funding for something > > > > they > > > > can request it from the foundation, but I don't think they can > > > > direct > > > > the foundation not to fund something someone else requests. > > > >=20 > > > > Also, given Antarus' response in the thread, I'm not sure there is > > > > anything for council to discuss. > >=20 > > > Does 'being not sure' authorize you to arbitrarily decide to skip > > > agenda items from the community? > >=20 > > I don't read William's reponse in such a way. The Council can still > > discuss the issue, and the Foundation may or may not listen. > >=20 > > Ultimately it is up to them how they want to spend their money. > > I believe that part is clear. >=20 > However the response is to be read, there's no item for this > in the agenda. So it's pretty much a single Council member individually > deciding what Council discusses or not. You know that in the past some things that have come up on the call for age= nda items thread have not ended up on the agenda. As was already said, any discussion we do around this doesn't really matter since we do not control financial issues for the distro. William --yiCuR3z6u6h1cJ3c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCYJAJTwAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OK5IAKCC7slvOe75T4MeD33PYBq/pYAqdACfYBqVHLdDnebFN1rM4nCXC6/VTe8= =SvvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yiCuR3z6u6h1cJ3c--