Could you add references to the relevant council decisions for these?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> We recently saw a proposal by ajak for updating GLEP 39, which would
> require an all-developers vote. If we do that, we could use it to get
> some other changes in. Some of them are pending since many years;
> I have collected them from bugzilla, council meeting logs, and mailing
> list postings.
> 
> The patches in this series should be independent of each other (and of
> ajak's patch), so each of them can be discussed separately.
> 
> Ulrich Müller (6):
>   glep-0039: Update title
>   glep-0039: Updating GLEP 39 requires an all-developers vote
>   glep-0039: Replace leaving council members by next in line
>   glep-0039: Council members must be developers
>   glep-0039: A meeting must dissolve if not quorate
>   glep-0039: Projects need not have a lead
> 
>  glep-0039.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 
>