On 2020.02.21 09:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 22:24 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> > Alec Warner schrieb:
> > 
> > > I'm a little bit concerned that this addresses the symptoms
> instead of the  problem. Have you shared your concerns with comrel
> regarding their lack of  timely communication on reported issues? Do
> they even share the same goals  you enumerated?
> > > 
> > > My strawperson argument is that:
> > >   - (0) The council will elect some lead.
> > >   - The lead will never write reports (or write them but stop.)
> > >   - The lead will get removed per policy.
> > >   - Council will elect a new lead.
> > >   - GOTO 0
> > 
> > My suggestion is in that case of missed report deadline, Council
> asks for 
> > volunteers from the developer community to step up, and appoints two
> of them 
> > to go through ComRel records and produce the transparency report.
> > 
> > Regular independent review of ComRel activity is what NeddySeagoon
> and I 
> > originally suggested and discussed with ComRel a while back. But
> they seemed 
> > completely against it, so we eventually dropped it.
> > 
> 
> All things considered, maybe creating a separate 'revision' group
> would
> be better, independently of the reports.  Either split ComRel in two,
> or
> appoint something independent.  Let 'core' ComRel do their work, while
> the 'revision' group merely monitor their activities without getting
> directly involved in the process.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny
> 
> 

This 'revision' group alread exists. Its called the Gentoo council.
Unless, that is, council have no oversight of comrel?

-- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) a member of
elections
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
arm64