From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335FC1382C5 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C67FCE09A8; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E929E08A2 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:56:38 -0500 From: Aaron Bauman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2021-01-10 (late call, meeting this week!) Message-ID: References: <20210105184436.02bb5216@sf> <3e026015371226a2f039a5bc5938c7c314634528.camel@gentoo.org> <8c1c0b42-47c6-ee7f-5cbf-61555b2327d2@gentoo.org> <6ea7726394d21aae263ad3f69c42e4c4cd8719b7.camel@gentoo.org> <297c8a90-bbf5-95b4-f431-51af7477b50f@gentoo.org> <91011fc0315ae3ba57c90b7695bd1f97c99e404d.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7LEFJaVSMdfbG89/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91011fc0315ae3ba57c90b7695bd1f97c99e404d.camel@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 84501eb0-78b3-40aa-82c6-5d554eceaba0 X-Archives-Hash: b98507c3c7d0fcce92cedab11096f95e --7LEFJaVSMdfbG89/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 23:57 -0500, desultory wrote: > >=20 > > So, just to be clear, you are pushing a suggestion which received much > > more negative feedback than positive and which you avoid following > > whenever possible? >=20 > Kinda odd then that it was accepted by the council unanimously, don't > you think? >=20 > The acceptance by the council is irrelevant to desultory's reply here. Oddly, I agree with desultory's response and implication here. Of course, like any rule/regulation/suggestion/CoC, we are all guilty at one time or another of violating it. -Aaron --7LEFJaVSMdfbG89/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEmv7M5qd5RX+UB+cwV6vTrTwY1fAFAl/8ZyMACgkQV6vTrTwY 1fCuGAf9HgDG+ee6lHc58CThUml6zDfRkcTp6f4J3/lYSnJE20HyLq9L6G18aLFj ismTqpteBDbDVGCszXu3sDhWRytuszXZI4S5N/rcZ7k6tpqaRi+hDr28icbkxzTz +T3LgHRXkUi8gj9wudzdKWE4m80tfAW/XjZ1XOfaTviirl/mxr1vnDeAsAcf+EU/ YP995edv8yvWlBwG6l653eAIdxsCgG+JjfP6Kcdt949PoxU80d1ApmoQhMm9alHg Njnzr5augEQNnDrvc1wW+2PbQaSvXDmlRnIXwe5+lRvCMM34Fbmpua5WwpFIQqNK RErlzSBpblvwT1VP/1lgflLhUa6Hww== =reQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7LEFJaVSMdfbG89/--