From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2204-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B206E138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AEC721C01C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-da0-f53.google.com (mail-da0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5A521C055
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:08:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g9so706634dad.40
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=IkRn1VIoaUsEjkECrwkNGq643uGAlFqPbqVo47xOZqk=;
        b=eqEiFqi/w6pto71OSP5c5MLPXyq9/C/dizX4IUN1919wFa2NtqeGLzCwEkyQzRTspa
         JAnOYN+q1TiWn9Xve79ik+cfEZhLgKXnmGE57X0VJ76pGQH24h3oeAuX6UkXf6qC+TW9
         jkRdTv6rUVave5sEuRsr8nSIPjMLlUPSKfmJcLbtz/f0TXinF3yjel6L54XpgMCjCvJK
         O5QdPe6ul9x9qZ0ysASPD/TrRcxts64ce4S6NsUyIrrJIb3cCGsql20mPhGCH70sYQS8
         FYvVylecGQ3XOdzbs5osuAYoME8fYTEK5wuRfON9j+Tg1+HycxIi+7e6JJTMaXNg4F7U
         SVzg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.192.97 with SMTP id hf1mr113862095pbc.106.1351703306192;
 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tampakrap@gmail.com
Received: by 10.68.72.5 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzR1wnYdJY4RNE7+WwejH4QzBnux_wdW8aUyNiGDxShwxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPDe-1NLRncQ+JEx_TgZEF_CTpLuokj544YNA10BL1i8KXCHJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB9SyzR1wnYdJY4RNE7+WwejH4QzBnux_wdW8aUyNiGDxShwxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:08:26 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kY2d37hzHZyi5J7Ywv9MravMOz0
Message-ID: <CAPDe-1MdPpAYP6h7KVoMW7_kW2X4YL+PWEhD63=T_n_f_ELJFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] proposal for reducing of cross-posting
From: Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 4e220965-8e32-4ff2-975c-8535a647f0f6
X-Archives-Hash: c7ba203d540a67f1c54f5037cfabfc98

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 30 October 2012 23:41, Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to propose the two following things:
>> 1) to stop cross-posting between gentoo-dev and gentoo-dev-announce.
>> gentoo-dev-announce has reply-to gentoo-dev, I see no reason for
>> cross-posting.
>> 2) to stop cross-posting for council announcements between
>> gentoo-dev-announce and gentoo-project, and instead to post them only
>> in gentoo-dev-announce and not use gentoo-project for council at all,
>> because they are mails regarding technical issues, while
>> gentoo-project is a list decidated to non-technical discussions.
>> Opinions?
>
> Why? I don't see the point of this. Also for continuance of archives,
> I think the current practice makes perfect sense.

fair enough, I'll try to stop some automated mails being double-posted
for no reason. Thanks for the replies