On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org> wrote:
>
> Ironically, being open and responsive to tinfoil-esque comments actually
> will do a great deal to dispel tinfoil-esque paranoia going forward.
>

While that seems like a reasonable hypothesis, I fear that it isn't
well-established with data.

In any case I support being open just to be open, and so far the
people who have been in dual-roles have chosen to recuse themselves,
so this seems mostly like a hypothetical argument.

Cool. Regarding the specific wording of William's patch to GLEP 39, I would suggest possibly softening the wording of "will be removed" and just state that they can only serve in one capacity. Sounds a bit violent currently :)

I'd prefer an option to opt out rather than a mandatory stepping down, but I am not outright opposed to it. I have no gory details of naughty things guiding my viewpoint, just trusting that if WilliamH has concerns, others probably do too.

And yes, I know that it is not my decision to make. Just sharing my perspective. I figure that's worth saying every now and then.

-Daniel