From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2499-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77611381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:16:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67C4CE0848;
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:16:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37D8E0815
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: qnikst)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF06033DA22
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so188201oag.12
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=TtFztcz46258Ec3csPGhqav7+48KUbmXkA7IZRkcZVk=;
b=gI7qVYC5j6dY0pZFmc37ajjg3szc6YsYFB+V4izHxVy8MX1OJvN8OSPOFUiVS9NVVU
VNI0WXrNebDxg7SOt8q41fWa3CKvOO7zePiVk0bf3ie5iu6kHFZYi+ucfKxGOmExP4kl
YoECkmZhp1onkLxbt487EfIy6mqkTTFR8kqoSRcbYTTRPdibF38oKdNgnDOJyyeiAPF0
Dq9ynhZn/hIiQP6b8UIl124z7X605Aa6n0syxDHCCQUcSK7YwzikN/SIjDtXGxh0LtlY
OevQpCbO+qgqHsA4RpwhJKs8k1a1Xsyy42xXUfSgtLbGyRdh3lI7L07vTT5E9IvP3GcZ
pCRA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.87.3 with SMTP id t3mr15644751obz.4.1371046570770; Wed,
12 Jun 2013 07:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.133.147 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mtQcfuBT_-Hww5m=eZKrTULqcDT1a47pnkbv=XtqVsBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGfcS_mLUy+YPG+Fkgbm4w_4h7iWgD=i6KEG-c158MBfX+xJdA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+NrkpfMdfokw4AQ7-AvoHRXeUPDS8OYV8e_=2ioqyibuy1Prg@mail.gmail.com>
<1371039602.27198.24.camel@localhost>
<CAGfcS_mtQcfuBT_-Hww5m=eZKrTULqcDT1a47pnkbv=XtqVsBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:16:10 +0400
Message-ID: <CAO-1Pb5A6FfLpN9bZPTwt2dPxuJUh1=RsO9CLdikMDMhciF9yg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
From: Alexander V Vershilov <qnikst@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: befadd38-5f9f-49db-abad-b4f56f228316
X-Archives-Hash: 578eeae321ef452c5737b0f36341e7de
On 12 June 2013 17:59, Rich Freeman <rich@thefreemanclan.net> wrote:
>
>
> Honestly, right now what I'd advocate for systemd unit maintainers is to:
> 1. File a bug with the maintainer with a patch asking for the unit to
> be added, and indicating that if there is no response in 7 days it
> will be commited.
> 2. If the maintainer doesn't commit it themselves, then commit it for
> them in 7 days.
It will be good if commiter will add himself/or systemd team to metadata with
description that unit bugs will be should be assigned to him. As it will add a
level of responsibility for commiter, as he should realize that if
current maintainer is
unable or unwilling to test this part of functionality.
> 3. If the maintainer objects, then if the unit is important tell the
> maintainer that you are also going to maintain the package, and commit
> it anyway.
> 4. If the original maintainer quits, oh well. Continue to maintain
> the package or not per your personal interests. If the original
> maintainer gets into revert-wars/etc escalate to devrel. As an
> additional maintainer be responsive to bugs related to the unit file
> you committed.
>
>
> Rich
>
--
--
Alexander