From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA141381F3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C35DFE09B6; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com (mail-qe0-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B9CE09B5 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q19so3872059qeb.16 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ndNXUTIzpBB8S75jiqGIb2XrsxqVvl81JyaeUhvZWpY=; b=wHc5x7+A3h0LfJQkRgS2K6POKNY+nH37SlXrSCQVQ+8JxVXWq5P3wZNfbcb9tyAKc+ ri4MI4uc0b50kEFYS9wNrIZ4xGMuFozi5jYjKz4rF4ELYpI2Ki/wTmOLadd/DavXsNHO 95zuqJXEZOvu1wNq459IEkt8tki6FHK8jrRl54S7xGgs3dpvlkhOvjaEnw2Yc7DB6lkR t+E5Ci8wutrsFOYfC3SOu8/d4WQ/Dvfz+LR0rNAdr9c+uVR0Df6CWMjXMt1CYalvtCBC Ie7wD2W6u8K4cWfPzlq13okHkSv+AVB/nWuhJ+sboHJNAYz8z+t8ir+FN1arhu1NkjMq qTAQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.116.176 with SMTP id jx16mr8869687qeb.52.1371727809334; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.42.65 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.42.65 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:30:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51C21229.9070105@gentoo.org> <20130619205029.44e1a3a3@gentoo.org> <20130619231740.5578d316@gentoo.org> <51C2DD11.7050007@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:30:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted From: Douglas Dunn To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d8b76cdd33104df94442e X-Archives-Salt: 12ddf221-bbb7-48bb-b6ee-b818d7719c41 X-Archives-Hash: 0d2884993001de04e5f6e4229c3a9321 --047d7b6d8b76cdd33104df94442e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To expand as i confused myself i meant that the appointment of a new devrel lead should be required to at least be confirmed by the council On Jun 20, 2013 7:25 AM, "Douglas Dunn" wrote: > In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 leads but should > at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and the lead and > or leads can make sure that the other devrel members are upholding the > intent of the coc. It doesn't take a law degree to enforce the coc, maybe > give individual devrel members the authority to give temporary punishments, > but i think anything permanent should go to the council to at least confirm > devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment. > > But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council, and the > council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal goes to the > council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by devrel. > --047d7b6d8b76cdd33104df94442e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To expand as i confused myself i meant that the appointment = of a new devrel lead should be required to at least be confirmed by the cou= ncil

On Jun 20, 2013 7:25 AM, "Douglas Dunn"= ; <djdunn.safety@gmail.com> wrote:

In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 lead= s but should at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and t= he lead and or leads can make sure that the other devrel members are uphold= ing the intent of the coc.=C2=A0 It doesn't take a law degree to enforc= e the coc, maybe give individual devrel members the authority to give tempo= rary punishments, but i think anything permanent should go to the council t= o at least confirm devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment.

But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council= , and the council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal go= es to the council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by dev= rel.

--047d7b6d8b76cdd33104df94442e--