From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2680-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701811381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8590E0998;
Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:25:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com (mail-qa0-f45.google.com [209.85.216.45])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE3FE0975
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:25:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ci6so1032920qab.4
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=eawEwRxVDXfC3KKO0AiDraBqWnEV7wvnkHAZs+3B2fI=;
b=Ru9E2F+eCUX3/ckGM6eg0+WPTUCbz6HvztrAZi7WEy0qb/oPJUYesyPON/o0kSYYMN
0Qi59bVqpX2Leu9jgc/3jlo0lsBrPg8i0hof2gDmEowDXXlj8VBAtnqejJc1tMtWjbia
Jst/C6P6GQJimRlhOCEeAdgyWR4PZA6F0cn4SUfrLITlrZGDTyvH8NQ9e0PCY9dKfrDm
Ozvz6/m57MXPrM6f7hFgcCIkO4dcUBEOoZq5kQF3ZZ4ZxtZZFzQG0iDZNazL8eEAOCpp
c6aC1yRcHAvf4J210f/ap+QMExGr1JvdUAjO7k76qxfGfB4NLlc8X/rchvv3slu64WF7
nARw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.76.2 with SMTP id a2mr2898397qck.7.1371727555224; Thu,
20 Jun 2013 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.42.65 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.42.65 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2jQ8jov=ZQ1EuJD-0H+XyXJr9ARN6a0xgQ-1t4G7jG1DBNGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51C21229.9070105@gentoo.org>
<20130619205029.44e1a3a3@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_kvj0ZEkpgY2yNZw9fuFbmOJQetQbUg5HkwmmwDN_B=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20130619231740.5578d316@gentoo.org>
<51C2DD11.7050007@gentoo.org>
<CAG2jQ8jov=ZQ1EuJD-0H+XyXJr9ARN6a0xgQ-1t4G7jG1DBNGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM3ZnqowBAFHwRLb-NM5KAHQOC-0cXiU+EPH9i4E3yXLTZVnhA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted
From: Douglas Dunn <djdunn.safety@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354470818a86f8404df943529
X-Archives-Salt: 98920903-0f2f-4312-b894-bd8ed72223a8
X-Archives-Hash: 901039f11d71d577aa7172f382d0c8af
--002354470818a86f8404df943529
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 leads but should at
least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and the lead and or
leads can make sure that the other devrel members are upholding the intent
of the coc. It doesn't take a law degree to enforce the coc, maybe give
individual devrel members the authority to give temporary punishments, but
i think anything permanent should go to the council to at least confirm
devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment.
But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council, and the
council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal goes to the
council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by devrel.
--002354470818a86f8404df943529
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">In my opinion the devrel project lead or perhaps have 3 lead=
s but should at least be confirmed by the council, if that can happen and t=
he lead and or leads can make sure that the other devrel members are uphold=
ing the intent of the coc.=C2=A0 It doesn't take a law degree to enforc=
e the coc, maybe give individual devrel members the authority to give tempo=
rary punishments, but i think anything permanent should go to the council t=
o at least confirm devrels suggestion of a permanent punishment.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">But imo if the lead of devrel needs confirmed by the council=
, and the council has the power to remove the lead, and the final appeal go=
es to the council, i dont see much room for the possibility of abuse by dev=
rel.</p>
--002354470818a86f8404df943529--