From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299E01381F3 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFC19E08FC; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F65EE08E8 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i13so1739928qae.6 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/mpHv3N9o7ZkTI+O+BQYKhJAfVJvSpxT8JDW7KjXFSQ=; b=gahxEmC4v0tfCMQD2pt5nk0j+KDU+/5KvXszIezznFYo8qWUf4FrjfiedRmbrt5u0u sJbZ9LltZzXvxmM7jd1QPjXBTGvuC+q20gyFSPLpCn/ZTI7epm8uX94SerCtOfkiofS6 eo4PsrN52excxUQGeVbCYvHmZnwrwuypr6TrPgHH7vqcUccDaFANl5XvFz7ymFo9ptm6 kjyZFdQsT2SOnG+7LMT/uqLWQDb91pFihkLeXkfTRmSYzEbPJsfT76ZLGghkKLc9BsHY 3rvQjW+iZJRgauoMBX6jiu2OPPl43m9F8ruxj3WHJwFxJ+wKuLieMygT6oezGIq0yJJq qaYw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.24.52 with SMTP id r20mr22848312qef.54.1371502448341; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.98.229 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.98.229 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51BF6055.3090108@gentoo.org> References: <20130616212124.GA29293@orbis-terrarum.net> <51BF6055.3090108@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:54:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo: growing pains & the future. From: Douglas Dunn To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a93a63e06b804df5fcc76 X-Archives-Salt: b4535aec-e6fe-4081-a889-e351d4a7f6e3 X-Archives-Hash: 4d9a327d431d50c7481a6804830004cf --047d7b3a93a63e06b804df5fcc76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > GLEP 39 was originally voted in by all devs. The council has previously > decided it does not have the authority to change it. It might not be a > bad idea to poll developers in connection to our yearly elections on if > they still think GLEP 39 is current. > > Regards, > Petteri > A good idea i think, but if we can come up with an amendment/replacement for glep 39 before then, it would be a perfect time to use the opportunity just to piggyback that vote for that change in with the yearly council election and kill 2 birds with one stone --047d7b3a93a63e06b804df5fcc76 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> GLEP 39 was originally voted in by all devs. The council has previousl= y
> decided it does not have the authority to change it. It might not be a=
> bad idea to poll developers in connection to our yearly elections on i= f
> they still think GLEP 39 is current.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>

A good idea i think, but if we can come up with an amendment= /replacement for glep 39 before then, it would be a perfect time to use the= opportunity just to piggyback that vote for that change in with the yearly= council election and kill 2 birds with one stone

--047d7b3a93a63e06b804df5fcc76--