From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D12A138010 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 057C8E058F for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B398B21C045 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ieak12 with SMTP id k12so605066iea.40 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UnzTkkD4CqKc62qmNcG7J3li64w/0gH5dClVGFYHu6A=; b=0eSBXAD+jud2MaolM1XuKDI3Fnrtc7ivIGxh1ZN96KHpsn/oKuo2tAEa2b7P/3ukFT vdzs4cto3CyIFortl1eX6Ycij97kX2aLI3rCAo01WsPMeLjAazxtFQtvT/ebbCXhqGmu aexlRLW67WulfbLMXaFJuW4j4V+2ch7YeWHmbURPjA5GS/0Am2xbuzsuNNuu4TSFlHzq ZmvGZxiDfRDy1CQTaQQQE3SxJM6SdVG4BIyoCOIH6mXHOuC828YNvSN+2kk2cAX/dLpd skDmTihdipAlk7e3DPZ/9QcAIO9G2gZYw8nujzDk9LLHU3dnYU0YFkSpLdjIiOVFshlC rGzg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.168.105 with SMTP id zv9mr2343596igb.73.1347109960999; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.13.134 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120815002021.0676b290@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120807191736.GF49719@gentoo.org> <20520.6784.427242.325755@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20522.23125.717981.676275@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201208142318.01431.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20120814223556.780b481d@googlemail.com> <502AC963.5040000@gentoo.org> <20120814230204.1eada549@googlemail.com> <20120815002021.0676b290@pomiocik.lan> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:12:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC From: David Leverton To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5b4cf612-5da6-4e12-9717-fa61936c332d X-Archives-Hash: 3f107cfc3e8f98da6c7b35ebfd2f61d0 On 14 August 2012 23:20, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:02:04 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> There's still the issue that we haven't decided what [use] deps do >> when they show up in profile files. We were sticking at 1 until we >> worked that out. > > Ah, about that. It will be useful if [use] deps in package.mask worked > unlike in package.use.mask, thus giving us a tool to temporarily mask > packages which are broken only with given flags. Do we have a verdict on this? What Micha=C5=82 suggests for package.mask sounds OK to me, but use deps in package.use, package.use.mask, etc could be rather nastier, and I'd be inclined to ban those unless someone has a better idea.