I guess it boils down to priority.  History becomes inconvenient to trace at some point.  That's true for most human things...nothing is perfect. 

seemantk empathic design
http://seemantk.com

On Oct 5, 2014 10:48 PM, "Ulrich Mueller" <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014, Seemant Kulleen wrote:

> Libraries don't have to be sad.  If the history remains in a CVS
> repo isn't that the perfect home for it in the museum of gentoo's
> history?

Having the complete history in a single repository would be much
preferable, even if that history is not perfect.

It's annoying if you search for the point when some change was
performed, only to find that the repo's history doesn't reach back
that far. I've had this issue e.g. with the Portage repository whose
history was cut off at some point. Having to change tools (from git to
cvs) in addition doesn't make it better.

Ulrich