From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AD31381F3 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4FB4E08C1; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4896BE08BE for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-x233.google.com (mail-ia0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A2E33DFF0 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p22so1425609iad.38 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 08:15:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i6Mee/4EVVfuzX0Qp+mgQdlvqqPeA3PGZibGM2XkKCE=; b=F4/5o4s+3Tw95qdPpfVnCDE96fAQiYKtEhKz+O65AXJ7+lGJVIeRO4PYep8Tdpdd6q qfbXXSrJJNhRz3VW6vVdwnWL1QRVrYDG+xixen8fwaIn+YZoxexz00wAQnMbMh5bJs6s fZrqL6xnaeimwD5rIq3+gnJBKdMOIQKepobw1nUYOep1cn4WON64We7DdU+B22AnCeUQ WDHIj898TOT2EKP1djZZtE35xtZRLTk8DjUTTDc/4PLrLN6ighN0Old0RuArrjUokg/d miU7e651coWTpZU6odP1TiJ6+lqCjqbCFenZAjJ7O0EhyTJO1vsLu5E6qQr/LBj2FkKw PXjw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.117.138 with SMTP id t10mr1611418icq.25.1367421327627; Wed, 01 May 2013 08:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.63.51 with HTTP; Wed, 1 May 2013 08:15:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <517C03E8.7040406@gentoo.org> References: <517C03E8.7040406@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:15:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-05-14 From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: aeddcbfb-b362-49c2-adcb-eb313a8c89a8 X-Archives-Hash: 036e2e57c9733d484bba08b746b7ba24 On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty = wrote: > In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > to discuss or vote on. > > Please respond to this email with agenda items. Please do not hesitate > to repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). > > The agenda for the next meeting will be sent out on Tuesday > 7th of May 2013. > > Please respond to the gentoo-project list for the items and have the > actual discussion on the items on the best suited mailing list (usually > gentoo-dev or gentoo-project). > I would like to get the council's opinion on enabling the "preserve-libs" portage feature by default in the stable portage branch. This feature compliments the slot-operator feature introduced with EAPI 5 by keeping libraries installed until reverse dependencies can be rebuilt. Zac Medico seems to be ok with it, but requested that I ask the council to discuss it.