From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F55198005 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82B68E0595; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD069E0595 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0DE433DBC5 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id bn7so3845459ieb.11 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:47:52 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.247.8 with SMTP id ma8mr6132833icb.1.1362156472669; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:47:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.102.66 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:47:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130301163513.00573eb4@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20130301163513.00573eb4@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:47:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] The Rise and Fall of a Central Contributor: Dynamics of Social Organization and Performance in the Gentoo Community From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 5f76061c-f082-4900-bdc0-906f497ba74f X-Archives-Hash: 7168a4dc9a8758e4bfe7ce404820172f On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > We have been analysed! > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.7191 > > > Regards, > jer > As a relative newbie, I have to ask: Who is this "central contributor" that the paper refers to?