From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC695139085 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF62423411E; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-x241.google.com (mail-qt0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA0723411D for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-x241.google.com with SMTP id n13so22268476qtc.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:27:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=jw1rqe2KRCVezA5mTw0NwuDUtj2iRwthYmzvOUodPgM=; b=D8O3r5mngGzDnTkht7IMnTznGgW6jI6NNKkHpchoA+z4cDHA/5km8Bjct/QwuAM4MI r3V+sjGzWsS7+6WP7hR5q9maSNOLkh4uhGqFdwMglimh2RRkZyIGZ9JwFSd5nwFKj+5s g9p0ja4aCMKmfeW6aYV79aCvuYH08oIR5hqB2Uupis+j/inFcZ/3J4wR7nPnFrkIlxxV AOr2waborSkMWFkUB828T7P2MBut0uYK8ANMN2qynv8pSb+WDoCB8QbFdEmbuJwLuYDM RJaE82b3aisq+CXxo/a0XLbEsk0cFol7/Q8iJ18u2putbNMiOn7v/xyNDkl9WLbIj9/y yO6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jw1rqe2KRCVezA5mTw0NwuDUtj2iRwthYmzvOUodPgM=; b=Cr1V9B/caGAHSpZDbhNmi7oSHzfCZPM5BdSb9sO2CeCQZ/PJ8pI2Y1s7PtwpRFdBCd CnT1rK+0aTyLX5Qp3ogXZu4SBkJeXQYEm3hr3/B+hkTK1fo7tH1x3TmaEK8zYZYwR7LD zFrNooAsmZ9McWlLQ2Od8cpA/7SZiIxZcEXi/xsGDWAb5exbPft+50tMnRto846KHocO kjiQOISipMzyo0I4dZ67tFbs5uau1ps27boF87MT796g1jCJ2g96uHo7Pi/9/79lUTbx PocSyqHqfmiSlAKb7clC6p21G8CW4bXUqUnEhGBCWyHtneWd2BvUKtkQ+YA0X4GFTUEp wtdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJBU/v1pbWedPkxsQAB6JQMUIYk1KUKfvxirpJT7Zh53tm7lYfcAGZC+8T+pJJPLBbN+EBpqcnHiil6tA== X-Received: by 10.55.33.136 with SMTP id f8mr24464214qki.132.1484666819734; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:26:59 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.16.132 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:26:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <07794881-ff2b-f269-7b0c-ec3b9ef9133f@gentoo.org> References: <20170115195209.70d3a748.mgorny@gentoo.org> <07794881-ff2b-f269-7b0c-ec3b9ef9133f@gentoo.org> From: Rich Freeman Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:26:58 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9Ws2xxhoRqyOtk1HL8oacChD_SQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 72f8e2d5-2289-43fc-80c9-e80982b3ca2e X-Archives-Hash: bc7281f0a054cca1e2bd440aae724e12 On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > I think a more fair restriction would be to place it on Comrel and > Council, as they are being trusted to not share private information. ++, in general (and anybody else doing the actual moderation/etc). > What the two (or more?) sides do in a dispute isn't something we can > reasonably control, except on our own infrastructure. I find it > unnecessary and meaningless to place sanctions on users or other > participants of a conflict if they choose to make their communications > public. It's /their/ dirty laundry, after all. I tend to agree, but perhaps it would still make sense to restrict the use of Gentoo media for such things (anything bearing our trademark). My thinking is that we really don't want the community to be full of petty personal bickering. It isn't something I feel strongly about. I'm more concerned about people entrusted with personal information keeping it private. -- Rich