From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4951381F3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9047D21C008 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75978E04BA for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j5so853890bkw.40 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:06:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dojH9Hp0dFJ1yXUW0CPivr96Wj+PBZAowXQgF1AaUe4=; b=diVcDGK35Z5YvkPOGDD8sYatAOQrL2Ke+J/w7vPbjqwmx2usEqzbMCsG6UmYBFAZwB MLTRRjvHKJ7VnPjkr0wRrotNxmQ3EyS36hPT6RZ117XUSbIotytqr7UO2TpZoNg6zXGs JVXoZgocrTVAcwIG+rkmSfqWFFwTzVuR6XZ4XT6S7Ln0dnxnS3Qk5qOioyrjh/GdQDOX 9U9M9jpB3UD5f1ixDlOa77uG4dEmEcu6B6ngte4XJ0Hed/2MBdmK/ap98hWvhciQsVKd Gt39cbAV5eiPdaAI0LC4lYa6XgNZE/sI1n67x8R6zC+QiA9XK+KFSSVf9kBcacR6SbX3 SQzg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.210 with SMTP id z18mr7984004bkv.53.1352815579953; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.12.28 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121113075530.GF83592@gentoo.org> References: <50A1B335.2080907@gentoo.org> <20121113075530.GF83592@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:06:19 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6YM9H_Wc_5fvljk96itP5T7S5ZY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6230e380-a088-4275-8c96-198d582d51ae X-Archives-Hash: f6ff97fcaafe6c240bf2e0a8e2016a9d On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 12-11-2012 21:40:53 -0500, Richard Yao wrote: >> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related to >> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another >> month so that we have time to get organized? > > The Council has no votes scheduled for today's meeting. > Huh? 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes) - approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and implement one of the two "supported" solutions) - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript - define timeframe * 30 days * 6 months * 1 year 3. Policy on "<" versioned dependencies[2] (5 minutes) - state whether said policy exists (homework for the council members) Rich