On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > I agree. Plus, if we use git-notes to *append* to ChangeLog entries > (in case you left out important information), we've covered all bases > as far as I'm concerned. > > > If something is REALLY critical that needs to be fixed you can always use a hack like adding a line of whitespace or something and re-committing (which will work with any scm), but I'd only reserve that for when a changelog entry is so factually wrong that it risks a real problem. However, I'd really question whether ChangeLogs are the place to store such a critical piece of documentation in the first place. If it is THAT important that users know about a change it should be in news. I agree that it seems like we're at the point where "just a little better" is becoming the enemy of "already way better than what we have." Rich