From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB81913877A for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28AF1E086F; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D3CE07EA for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ij19so2395444vcb.22 for ; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=0FzLHN5KoeFvCD+1t8MHReDEh9mR4gNtqQZbgSqb5w0=; b=AIzKEWTxCefPM+d8fOKS5XGNO3kQg9nqhn3WWhmS4phxjb35E88IvcFxF/hQRlN31B E8k3u84HfTD2/WOz6qbxb8U5v6TXEkWik+LlP7e2nXsPzpD6T5801m4hgut/3f3dNUtF KO+8qSFGE4H2KDsc2hychexDkSSrhvvqyr4K5zGrABs9hdXlFBCOn0AnZFzwWNVN06jX qeZzUiVp0fvW36w4Vs0ibI/0K45EulLlMquKB6ahoCsC4+Oc8he3lBGXL2LL0XVsLXdE ZiRLKUxDjR4w/JROk/Neh9YMWk4b/9yMqFOfY5VQ33ntm4Cie4t1V+OCfc1pcl388f1j GtIA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.116.194 with SMTP id jy2mr655683vdb.39.1404571774618; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.72.19 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140705163030.3cb7f77e@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <539BD2E2.7030803@gentoo.org> <3677509.vVmt2iqRkA@kailua> <53B53E12.10209@opensource.dyc.edu> <1827087.o57vyRvkxh@kailua> <53B58E33.5010906@gentoo.org> <53B6834C.5050003@gentoo.org> <20140705033649.67d2d1c5@gentoo.org> <20140705163030.3cb7f77e@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:49:34 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BWjY95s69DtV26CnxjY4SpNVkr0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2014 / 2015 election From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 7c20704c-6571-4886-acf8-cd6d0ab2628e X-Archives-Hash: 87bc06da3e7d76e6562865006ba239de Look, this sniping isn't doing anybody any good. If somebody wants to take me aside and offer helpful advice, just ping me on IRC or something. I mean, we have a member of Council and a member of ComRel getting annoyed with each other over what started as the topic of conflicts of interests in cases that come before Council and ComRel. Is the goal to test what happens when both ComRel and Council members have to recuse themselves on the same case? :) (And, to be clear, my last paragraph is purely intended to point out the irony of the situation. I would prefer to just work out issues 1:1 vs on the lists, but this isn't exactly keeping me up at night...) Rich